We performed a comparison between Skyhigh Security and Tenable.sc based on our users’ reviews in five categories. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.
Features: Tenable.sc excels in vulnerability detection, prioritization, and automation accuracy. On the other hand, Skyhigh Security boasts strong URL spam filtering, endpoint protection, and efficient backup features. While Skyhigh lacks SD-WAN, it is a market leader with good technical support and pricing. Tenable.sc has room for improvement in penetration testing, pricing, GUI, reporting, and support accuracy. Meanwhile, Skyhigh Security has deficiencies in support for unsanctioned apps, API integration, pricing, UI, reporting, and backup processes.
Service and Support: Tenable.sc's customer service is uncomplicated with varying satisfaction levels in response times and quality depending on the region. Skyhigh Security's support quality is dependent on the technician and subscription plan with mixed reviews on response times.
Ease of Deployment: Tenable.sc has a straightforward and easy initial setup that can be completed in a day, while Skyhigh Security's setup varies in difficulty and can take anywhere from five minutes to two weeks. Tenable.sc's setup is positively rated, while Skyhigh Security's setup is a mix of straightforward and complex.
Pricing: Tenable.sc charges based on IP addresses and extra fees for support, with differing opinions on pricing. Skyhigh Security has mixed reviews on pricing and licensing, with some finding it expensive and others reasonable, but the hardware is noted as pricey.
ROI: Tenable.sc promises to decrease personnel expenses and ensure a favorable ROI, while Skyhigh Security enhances security measures, reduces the likelihood of data breaches, and improves reputation.
Comparison Results: Tenable.sc is the preferred choice over Skyhigh Security based on the advanced features it offers, including compliance and vulnerability scans, accurate detection, and a risk-based approach. It also provides quick and precise updates, fewer false positives, and more accurate reports.
"The solution performs well."
"A stable solution with good support."
"It's a great product with solid features."
"Skyhigh performs well, and we can choose from virtual and hardware plans. We can deploy the ISO on as many virtual machines as possible and easily set up high availability on the web proxy. The location doesn't matter. The user at a site will always access the web proxy for that location. It's suitable for an organization distributed across multiple regions."
"The stability is the most valuable feature. We haven't had any issues with the product."
"Box API features with DLP capabilities."
"Overall, the performance is good."
"Tokenization."
"Tenable is the leading product for vulnerability scanning."
"The most valuable features in Tenable SC are scanning and analysis."
"I found the dashboard features very useful. It made it easy to track remediation progress. I could publish dashboards to remediation teams and track the progress on the dashboards."
"Very customizable with a lot of templates."
"The initial setup process is simple."
"I find Tenable SC to be a very scalable product."
"The tool provides us insight into the happens of the network and its hosts. It provides me with a list of hosts."
"The most valuable features of Tenable SC are scanning, reporting, dashboards, and automation."
"The tool could improve flexibility with the creation of reports/querying data."
"The cloud needs improvement with respect to DLP."
"One thing that can be improved is their ability to integrate with other web proxies to discover unsanctioned IP apps."
"The encrypted disk implementation could be improved. I currently use it from a dongle or USB key with two-factor authentication to access my computer."
"The biggest challenge we have with McAfee is their cross-cloud support."
"Its initial setup could be more straightforward."
"The pricing of the solution could be adjusted to make it more reasonable."
"The performance of the tool can be improved to provide faster report generation."
"A good plugin editor would be a good additional option for the Security Center."
"It's good at creating information, it's good creating dashboards, it's good at creating reports, but if you want to take that reporting metadata and put it into another tool, that is a little bit lacking."
"The product should provide risk-based vulnerability management."
"Tenable SC could improve by making the creation of the initial reports easier that correspond to our network."
"The web application scanning area can be improved."
"Tenable.sc's user interface could be improved."
"The solution needs to improve its support. I would like to see a bird's eye view of my network architecture. I would also like to see the continuous view feature in the tool."
"Certain aspects require manual effort, such as exporting and analyzing data for our dashboards. The built-in components of the Tenable solution are somewhat clumsy that require external tools. So, this is an area of improvement."
Skyhigh Security is ranked 17th in Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) with 51 reviews while Tenable Security Center is ranked 11th in Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) with 48 reviews. Skyhigh Security is rated 8.4, while Tenable Security Center is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Skyhigh Security writes "Good scalability, but the technical support service needs improvement". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tenable Security Center writes "A security solution for vulnerability assessment with automated scans". Skyhigh Security is most compared with Zscaler Internet Access, Netskope , Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps, Symantec Proxy and Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks, whereas Tenable Security Center is most compared with Tenable Vulnerability Management, Qualys VMDR, Rapid7 InsightVM, Tenable Nessus and Horizon3.ai. See our Skyhigh Security vs. Tenable Security Center report.
See our list of best Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) vendors.
We monitor all Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
