We performed a comparison between Sophos Cyberoam UTM and Sophos UTM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Unified Threat Management (UTM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The port forwarding is good."
"There are plenty of features available, such as Full Guard and WAN."
"The best feature is the flexibility the product offers, in terms of remote access. What we had before was a decentralized mechanism in our organization, but after having this product we were able to get the remote locations into the same LAN. We were able to control the bandwidth and were able to take virtual access of those machines and give them the support, as and when required."
"I'm more inclined towards the conventional firewall. So for me, I'm more geared towards the standard firewall type functionalities as well as the web application firewall because that seems to work fine."
"Our customers find it economical and offers good security. These two features are key. Ease of installation and implementation are also key factors."
"Bandwidth Management and aggregation. It is valuable for combining two ISPs. Switching to a secondary/redundant ISP is thus seamless, in the event that the primary ISP goes down. The Bandwidth Management is also valuable for limiting heavy downloaders that may impact negatively on the experience of other users."
"The tool's robust features allow for the customization of policies, objects, and firewall settings."
"We are using it as a security shield. It does not allow access before that in case we have restricted a few things from users, so it helps me in that."
"So far, the solution has been problem-free."
"Sophos UTM has improved the porting section. It has improved security by seeing the gaps. For example, when you discover that an entry has been using a certain application, with Sophos UTM acting as a Layer 7 firewall, you can block the application, not the port."
"Sophos UTM's best feature is SIM in the cloud, which combines the gateway solution and endpoint solution to send telemetry data to the cloud and provides full contact visibility regarding security."
"It works well without any maintenance. So far, it has worked pretty well regardless of the traffic."
"It is a very good product. The threat monitoring process is the most valuable feature."
"The most valuable feature is that it is easy to administer."
"This is a very stable product."
"It helps us with protection, with concurrent use of the VPN."
"The product fails to provide proper reports, making it an area where improvements are required."
"Sometimes, users are timed out intermittently."
"Cyberoam UTM needs to have more certifications with third-parties, such as NSS Labs."
"Sophos Cyberoam UTM could have a more advanced reporting function."
"The VPN is an area that can be improved."
"It is not a scalable product. This is because if you want to increase the capacity of the solution, then you have to change the device."
"The VPN needs to be improved."
"I would like to see real-time alerts on traffic insights."
"The initial setup was straightforward. The full deployment takes approximately two days which could be simplified to reduce the time. The major part of the process is the configuration and the policy setup."
"The solution needs better integration with captive portals and XGs."
"Doesn't provide antivirus for individual computers."
"They could use more SSL VPN support."
"We need to speed up the support."
"Sophos should improve its ability to check something like bandwidth consumption for users or something more real-time."
"There is absolutely no support when using AWS. If you buy the on-premise Sophos solution, you get support."
"It would be nice if it had basic features, such as DLP (Data Loss Prevention)."
Sophos Cyberoam UTM is ranked 9th in Unified Threat Management (UTM) with 81 reviews while Sophos UTM is ranked 3rd in Unified Threat Management (UTM) with 110 reviews. Sophos Cyberoam UTM is rated 8.0, while Sophos UTM is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Sophos Cyberoam UTM writes "Stable and has a straightforward setup; reporting is fast and easy". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Sophos UTM writes "It's a highly stable platform with very few hardware issues". Sophos Cyberoam UTM is most compared with Fortinet FortiGate, Cisco Secure Firewall, Netgate pfSense, Juniper SRX Series Firewall and Sophos XG, whereas Sophos UTM is most compared with Netgate pfSense, Fortinet FortiGate, Sophos XG, OPNsense and Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls. See our Sophos Cyberoam UTM vs. Sophos UTM report.
See our list of best Unified Threat Management (UTM) vendors.
We monitor all Unified Threat Management (UTM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.