We performed a comparison between SUSE NeuVector and Wiz based on our users’ reviews in five categories. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.
Features: SUSE NeuVector features an informative user interface and support for ISO certification checks. Wiz users like the user-friendly dashboards and risk prioritization. Users say SUSE NeuVector could be improved by expanding its scanning capabilities to include IaaS and virtual machines and easier integration. On the other hand, Wiz should focus on improving log integrations and reporting capabilities. Reviewers also want more visibility into EKS and Kubernetes containers.
Service and Support: SUSE NeuVector users value assistance from their support team, who are described as helpful and knowledgeable. However, some users said the overall process is complicated. Wiz customers commend the excellent support and accessible representatives. They also appreciate the strong post-sales support offered by Wiz.
Ease of Deployment: Users have reported mixed experiences with the initial setup of SUSE NeuVector, with some finding it to be complex and challenging. The initial setup of Wiz is considered to be straightforward and quick.
Pricing: SUSE NeuVector charges annual licensing fees, and it's considered cheaper than other solutions. Wiz provides a straightforward pricing structure. However, some were concerned about possible price fluctuations, and other users find Wiz to be pricier than alternatives.
ROI: SUSE NeuVector is beneficial for high-risk industries like financial services, while Wiz offers immediate advantages like improved asset management and vulnerability identification. Additionally, Wiz provides continuous value with new features and centralized investigations.
Comparison Results: SUSE NeuVector is preferred over Wiz because of its extensive features, informative user interface, and support for multiple clusters. It excels in performance, deployment, and cost.
"PingSafe's integration is smooth. They are highly customer-oriented, and the integration went well for us."
"We like the platform and its response time. We also like that its console is user-friendly as well as modern and sleek."
"We like PingSafe's vulnerability assessment and management features, and its vulnerability databases."
"Cloud Native Security's best feature is its ability to identify hard-coded secrets during pull request reviews."
"Support has been very helpful and provides regular feedback and help whenever needed. They've been very useful."
"PingSafe's most valuable feature is its unified console."
"It's helped free up staff time so that they can work on other projects."
"I like CSPM the most. It captures a lot of alerts within a short period of time. When an alert gets triggered on the cloud, it throws an alert within half an hour, which is very reasonable. It is a plus point for us."
"The initial setup is quite good, it's straightforward."
"The UI has a lot of features."
"When it comes to the price, we got a really good deal from the vendor instantly."
"The most valuable feature of SUSE NeuVector is the performance, deployment, and cost."
"The tool's deployment is simple. Also, I am impressed with its risk capabilities."
"The most valuable feature of SUSE NeuVector is its run-time security."
"The features of image scanning and anti-malware are really valuable."
"The CSPM module has been the most effective. It was easy to deploy and covered all our accounts through APIs, requiring no agents. Wiz provides instant visibility into high-level risks that we need to address."
"Out of all the features, the one item that has been most valuable is the fact that Wiz puts into context all the pieces that create an issue, and applies a particular risk evaluation that helps us prioritize when we need to address a misconfiguration, vulnerability, or any issue that would put our environment into risk."
"The security baseline and vulnerability assessments is the valuable feature."
"The first thing that stood out was the ease of installation and the quick value we got out of the solution."
"The product supports out-of-the-box reporting with context about the asset and allows us to perform complex custom queries on UI."
"The vulnerability management modules and the discovery and inventory are the most valuable features. Before using Wiz, it was a very manual process for both. After implementing it, we're able to get all of the analytics into a single platform that gives us visibility across all the systems in our cloud. We're able to correspond and understand what the vulnerability landscape looks like a lot faster."
"With Wiz, we get timely alerts for leaked data or any vulnerabilities already existing in our environment."
"The automation roles are essential because we ultimately want to do less work and automate more. The dashboards are easy to read and visually pleasing. You can understand things quickly, which makes it easy for our other teams. The network and infrastructure teams don't know as much about security as we do, so it helps to have a tool that's accessible and nice to look at."
"Maybe container runtime security could be improved."
"We are getting reports only in a predefined form. I would like to have customized reports so that I can see how many issues are open or closed today or in two weeks."
"It took us a while to configure the software to work well in this type of environment, as the support documents were not always clear."
"PingSafe can improve by eliminating 100 percent of the false positives."
"It does not bring much threat intel from the outside world. All it does is scan. If it can also correlate things, it will be better."
"We use PingSafe and also SentinelOne. If PingSafe integrated some of the endpoint security features of SentinelOne, it would be the perfect one-stop solution for everything. We wouldn't need to switch between the products. At my organization, I am responsible for endpoint security and vulnerability management. Integrating both functions into one application would be ideal because I could see all the alerts, heat maps, and reports in one console."
"The could improve their mean time to detect."
"There is room for improvement in the current active licensing model for PingSafe."
"SUSE NeuVector should provide more security protection rules and better container image scanning."
"I would say that this solution should improve monitoring and reporting. I would also like to see more integrations so that we could essentially make it a part of a developing pipeline."
"The documentation needs to improve a bit."
"SUSE NeuVector could improve by increasing its visibility into other elements of the DevSecOps pipeline. Additionally, scanning around infrastructure would be helpful."
"We are also working with IaaS VMS, but NeuVector doesn't support virtual machines."
"The tool should offer seamless integration of other security tools while in a hybrid environment."
"The image-scanning features need improvement."
"The solution's container security could be improved."
"The remediation workflow within the Wiz could be improved."
"The only small pain point has been around some of the logging integrations. Some of the complexities of the script integrations aren't supported with some of the more automated infrastructure components. So, it's not as universal. For example, they have great support for cloud formation and other services, but if you're using another type of management utility or governance language for your infrastructure-as-code automation components, it becomes a little bit trickier to navigate that."
"We would like to see improvements to executive-level reporting and data reporting in general, which we understand is being rolled out to the platform."
"The reporting isn't that great. They have executive summaries, but it's only a compliance report that maps all current issues to specific controls. Whether you look at one subscription or project, regardless of the size, you will get a multipage report on how the issues in that account map to that control. Our CSO isn't going to read through that. He won't filter that out or show that to his leadership and say, "Here's what we're doing." It isn't a helpful report. They're working on it, but it's a poor executive summary."
"Wiz's reporting capabilities could be refined a bit. They are making headway on that, but more executive-style dashboards would be nice. They just implemented a community aspect where you can share documents and feedback. This was something users had been requesting for a while. They are listening to customer feedback and making changes."
"Given the level of visibility into all the cloud environments Wiz provides, it would be nice if they could integrate some kind of mechanism to better manage tenants on multiple platforms. For example, let's say that some servers don't have an application they need, such as an antivirus. Wiz could include an API or something to push those applications out to the servers. It would be great if you could remedy these issues directly from the Wiz platform."
"We wish there were a way, beyond providing visibility and automated remediation, to wait on a given remediation, due to a critical aspect, such as the cost associated with a particular upgrade... We would like to see preventive controls that can be applied through Wiz to protect against vulnerabilities that we're not going to be able to remediate immediately."
More SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security Pricing and Cost Advice →
SUSE NeuVector is ranked 19th in Container Security with 7 reviews while Wiz is ranked 2nd in Container Security with 12 reviews. SUSE NeuVector is rated 7.8, while Wiz is rated 9.2. The top reviewer of SUSE NeuVector writes "Good value for money; great for policy management". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Wiz writes "Multiple features help us prioritize remediation, and agentless implementation reduces overhead". SUSE NeuVector is most compared with Sysdig Falco, Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks, Aqua Cloud Security Platform, Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes and Trivy, whereas Wiz is most compared with Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks, Orca Security, Microsoft Defender for Cloud, AWS Security Hub and Lacework. See our SUSE NeuVector vs. Wiz report.
See our list of best Container Security vendors and best Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) vendors.
We monitor all Container Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.