We performed a comparison between Trend Micro Cloud One and Wiz based on our users’ reviews in five categories. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.
Features: Trend Micro Cloud One and Wiz both offer valuable features for protecting against vulnerabilities and managing workloads. Trend Micro Cloud One excels in offering control over restrictions and total visibility, including insight into a microservice architecture. Meanwhile, Wiz prioritizes risks and offers easy-to-read dashboards with context, as well as automation roles. Trend Micro Cloud One needs work in areas such as pricing, automation, and licensing, as well as offering better documentation, logs, alerts, and flexibility. On the other hand, Wiz could benefit from preventive controls, refined reporting, customizable dashboards, improved risk assessment, and direct issue remediation.
Service and Support: Both Trend Micro Cloud One and Wiz have excellent technical support with knowledgeable and responsive staff. Wiz also offers easy access to account representatives and hand-holding during deployment. However, some customers suggest that Wiz could improve by making more information publicly accessible.
Ease of Deployment: Trend Micro Cloud One's setup was not universally easy, with some needing technical knowledge and others finding it simpler. The length of deployment varied, and a two-person team was suggested. Wiz was reported to be uncomplicated and quick to install, with some finishing in only a few hours. Wiz was mostly a SaaS tool that was low-maintenance and gave insight and analytics for cloud resources.
Pricing: Trend Micro Cloud One has mid-range pricing, whereas Wiz is on the pricier side. Trend Micro Cloud One's pricing is determined by the number of units, while Wiz has a straightforward pricing model that is deemed reasonable. However, there are worries about possible price hikes and a lack of pricing transparency with Wiz.
ROI: Trend Micro Cloud One is praised for its flexibility and easy integration, while Wiz is known for its superior asset management and vulnerability identification. Additionally, Wiz's SaaS platform offers added value for users, helping with compliance and monitoring controls.
Comparison Results: Trend Micro Cloud One is the preferred choice over Wiz based on user reviews. It has more comprehensive features, including virtual patching, login inspection, and control over server access and application installation. Wiz is praised for its ability to provide context and prioritize risks, but lacks preventive controls and refined reporting capabilities.
"There's real-time threat detection. It can show threats and find issues based on their severity and helps us with real-time monitoring."
"The solution helped free other staff to work on other projects or other tasks. We basically just had to do a bunch of upfront configuring. With it, we do not have to spend as much time in the console."
"Atlas security graph is pretty cool. It maps out relationships between components on AWS, like load balancers and servers. This helps visualize potential attack paths and even suggests attack paths a malicious actor might take."
"We use the infrastructure as code scanning, which is good."
"The multi-cloud support is valuable. They are expanding to different clouds. It is not restricted to only AWS. It allows us to have different clouds on one platform."
"The real-time detection and response capabilities overall are great."
"We like the platform and its response time. We also like that its console is user-friendly as well as modern and sleek."
"I did a lot of research before signing up and doing the demo. They have a good reputation as far as catching threats early on."
"It has the best EDR functionality for cloud and typical endpoints."
"I really like Trend Vision One - Cloud Security's dashboard."
"I like the conformity and workload security modules. Workload security is all about intrusion detection and prevention. Trend Vision One - Cloud Security has behavioral rules that are auto-populated based on organizational structure. That's one aspect that we liked most."
"The most valuable part of Trend Vision One - Cloud Security is its dashboard, as it's simple. It's easy to manage, and you can better control the solution."
"Detection response and cloud conformity are valuable features."
"Vision One is versatile and can be integrated with many SIEMs. You're not limited to only one SIEM, such as Microsoft Sentinel. The API integrations are seamless, and we have all the documentation needed to integrate Vision One via API."
"The product helps us understand our environment better."
"The perfect package for all security platforms, providing more than any other endpoint solution."
"The vulnerability management modules and the discovery and inventory are the most valuable features. Before using Wiz, it was a very manual process for both. After implementing it, we're able to get all of the analytics into a single platform that gives us visibility across all the systems in our cloud. We're able to correspond and understand what the vulnerability landscape looks like a lot faster."
"The solution is very user-friendly."
"The first thing that stood out was the ease of installation and the quick value we got out of the solution."
"The security baseline and vulnerability assessments is the valuable feature."
"Our most important features are those around entitlement, external exposure, vulnerabilities, and container security."
"The product supports out-of-the-box reporting with context about the asset and allows us to perform complex custom queries on UI."
"The CSPM module has been the most effective. It was easy to deploy and covered all our accounts through APIs, requiring no agents. Wiz provides instant visibility into high-level risks that we need to address."
"With Wiz, we get timely alerts for leaked data or any vulnerabilities already existing in our environment."
"The Automation tab is an add-on that doesn’t work properly. They provide a list of scripts that don’t work and I have asked support to assist but they won’t help. When running on various endpoints the script doesn’t work and if it does, it’s only a couple. There are a lot of useful scripts that would be beneficial to run forensics, event logs, and process lists running on the endpoint."
"I used to work on AWS. At times, I would generate a normal bug in my system, and then I would check PingSafe. The alert used to come after about three and a half hours. It used to take that long to generate the alert about the vulnerability in my system. If a hacker attacks a system and PingSafe takes three to four hours to generate an alert, it will not be beneficial for the company. It would be helpful if we get the alert in five to ten minutes."
"The Kubernetes scanning on the Oracle Cloud needs to be improved. It's on the roadmap. AWS has this capability, but it's unavailable for Oracle Cloud."
"I would like PingSafe's detections to be openly available online instead of only accessible through their portal. Other tools have detections that are openly available without going through the tool."
"The categorization of the results from the vulnerability assessment could be improved."
"It took us a while to configure the software to work well in this type of environment, as the support documents were not always clear."
"In some cases, the rules are strictly enforced but do not align with real-world use cases."
"Some of the navigation and some aspects of the portal may be a little bit confusing."
"The firewall configuration should have been automated based on the understanding of the application, utilities, and protocols."
"The local agent should be able to show more logs. At present, the logs are only available from the web console and not from the local agent."
"The product could use a little bit of automation."
"The pricing can get high."
"Trend Vision One - Cloud Security could improve connections with different types of authentication and user groups concerning cloud services."
"Trend Vision One - Cloud Security should address threats automatically without having user input."
"Trend Vision One - Cloud Security seems to have a preference for AWS Cloud over Azure and would be improved by focusing equally on both."
"The licensing model could be improved. To gain full coverage, you need to spend more to buy subscriptions for each kind of service they offer. It will start to be pricey if you want full coverage."
"The only thing that needs to be improved is the number of scans per day."
"Given the level of visibility into all the cloud environments Wiz provides, it would be nice if they could integrate some kind of mechanism to better manage tenants on multiple platforms. For example, let's say that some servers don't have an application they need, such as an antivirus. Wiz could include an API or something to push those applications out to the servers. It would be great if you could remedy these issues directly from the Wiz platform."
"The reporting isn't that great. They have executive summaries, but it's only a compliance report that maps all current issues to specific controls. Whether you look at one subscription or project, regardless of the size, you will get a multipage report on how the issues in that account map to that control. Our CSO isn't going to read through that. He won't filter that out or show that to his leadership and say, "Here's what we're doing." It isn't a helpful report. They're working on it, but it's a poor executive summary."
"We wish there were a way, beyond providing visibility and automated remediation, to wait on a given remediation, due to a critical aspect, such as the cost associated with a particular upgrade... We would like to see preventive controls that can be applied through Wiz to protect against vulnerabilities that we're not going to be able to remediate immediately."
"The only small pain point has been around some of the logging integrations. Some of the complexities of the script integrations aren't supported with some of the more automated infrastructure components. So, it's not as universal. For example, they have great support for cloud formation and other services, but if you're using another type of management utility or governance language for your infrastructure-as-code automation components, it becomes a little bit trickier to navigate that."
"Wiz's reporting capabilities could be refined a bit. They are making headway on that, but more executive-style dashboards would be nice. They just implemented a community aspect where you can share documents and feedback. This was something users had been requesting for a while. They are listening to customer feedback and making changes."
"The solution's container security could be improved."
"We're looking at some of the data compliance stuff that they've got Jon offer. I know they're looking at container security, which we gonna be looking at next."
More SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security Pricing and Cost Advice →
More Trend Vision One - Cloud Security Pricing and Cost Advice →
Trend Vision One - Cloud Security is ranked 6th in Cloud-Native Application Protection Platforms (CNAPP) with 17 reviews while Wiz is ranked 2nd in Cloud-Native Application Protection Platforms (CNAPP) with 12 reviews. Trend Vision One - Cloud Security is rated 8.6, while Wiz is rated 9.2. The top reviewer of Trend Vision One - Cloud Security writes "We can quickly deploy cloud conformity, provides good visibility, and control". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Wiz writes "Multiple features help us prioritize remediation, and agentless implementation reduces overhead". Trend Vision One - Cloud Security is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Cloud, AWS GuardDuty, Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration, Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks and AWS Security Hub, whereas Wiz is most compared with Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks, Orca Security, Microsoft Defender for Cloud, AWS Security Hub and Lacework. See our Trend Vision One - Cloud Security vs. Wiz report.
See our list of best Cloud-Native Application Protection Platforms (CNAPP) vendors, best Container Security vendors, and best Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) vendors.
We monitor all Cloud-Native Application Protection Platforms (CNAPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.