We performed a comparison between Tricentis Tosca and UiPath Test Suite based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Test Automation Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Tricentis Tosca is well integrated with other products like Jira."
"The tool can be handled without any knowledge in parameterisation, especially the TestCaseDesign which makes the tool mighty and stable."
"This solution is very easy to learn and any non-programmer or manual tester, with little experience in automation, can pick it up quite easily."
"For beginners, the product is good, especially for those who are interested in the quality side of software testing."
"Multiple scanning engines to automate many different applications."
"Image recognition: It has allowed us to automate a GUI section of our product which involves drawing different topologies."
"The automation engine is very strong, and it is very competitive in the market in terms of features. They develop a lot of features."
"The item that is different from all the other tools is that it's module based."
"The detailed logging is invaluable."
"It facilitates the delegation of control to multiple users and offers an efficient way to organize tasks using labels."
"Being able to use regular expressions, activities, and attributes is valuable."
"UiPath's tools are generally designed for business users, so they can be as simple or as complex as needed."
"It's useful for automating tasks."
"We can generate our own workflow. In our case, it is a report on the PDF file. In the reporting category, we generally verify a couple of things and generate a lot of reports at the end of the day. It provides some useful details about the data captured from the PDF that we can put into an Excel file."
"The console, in a single pane, allows us to understand where we are in the testing environment."
"We are finding bugs and defects much faster."
"The source controls that are in Tricentis Tosca have some problems. For example, if you use Selenium or use Java-based application, it's easy to match code from two developers. However, if you're a developer and going to look at Tricentis Tosca, it's very difficult to use the source control measure."
"The integration with mobile testing could be useful."
"They can make it more stable. I have used this tool for SAP applications. They have an alliance with SAP, and it mostly worked fine, but there were a few glitches. However, we got the required support from the Tricentis team. They are coming up with their new versions and upgrades with respect to how the Tricentis systems as cloud applications are updated, and it would be good if they have a robust accelerator pack."
"Setup wasn't that straightforward; it was more complex. It all depends on the environment, because there were a lot of errors on our applications. Therefore, it wasn't an easy setup for us."
"I would like a better user interface."
"The product needs to improve object identification. The identify with properties and anchor methods work perfectly, while the by-index and image methods may face challenges."
"The product is not very stable when used with cloud storage. It is very hard to load the screen, making it difficult to use the tool in cloud storage."
"First, Tricentis could improve Tosca's Linux scripting. We can automate Linux scripting, but there are a few commands that Tosca doesn't support. DVS support and the object identification mechanism could also be better."
"I don't rate its ability to automate very well."
"We'd like to see the solution integrate with more code or local frameworks."
"At FORWARD VI, we see new automations being built around AI and the ability to have developers understand how they can drive some of those AI capabilities with Studio. We are starting to see that. They should also drive that with UiPath Test Suite so that we can not only build that development side faster; we can also develop the tests that go along with it, hopefully automatically."
"The reporting could be improved. Often, we need to email a report to higher management, we can directly get the report from there. Also, the error reporting could be better."
"UiPath’s Test Suite manual testing doesn’t work for our organization based on how the QA Analysts do their manual testing and the artifacts that are needed for deployment."
"With Selenium, there is a plugin called Healenium, which helps automatically detect changed properties of objects. With one click, it automatically updates the object repository with the changed properties. I would like UiPath to add that capability."
"Our primary application is built on Windows, so we've faced no significant challenges. However, I think mobile automation is one area where the solution still needs some work."
"I'd like the solution to be even more automated."
Tricentis Tosca is ranked 1st in Test Automation Tools with 98 reviews while UiPath Test Suite is ranked 6th in Test Automation Tools with 17 reviews. Tricentis Tosca is rated 8.2, while UiPath Test Suite is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Tricentis Tosca writes "Does not require coding experience to use and comes with productivity and time-saving features ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of UiPath Test Suite writes "Can be used by non-developers, and saves us time, but the manual testing needs improvement". Tricentis Tosca is most compared with Katalon Studio, OpenText UFT One, Worksoft Certify, Postman and Informatica Test Data Management (TDM), whereas UiPath Test Suite is most compared with OpenText UFT One, SmartBear TestComplete, Katalon Studio, froglogic Squish and Opkey. See our Tricentis Tosca vs. UiPath Test Suite report.
See our list of best Test Automation Tools vendors and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.
We monitor all Test Automation Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
