We performed a comparison between ACCELQ Automate and Katalon Studio based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Katalon Studio and others in Test Automation Tools."The platform contributes to faster test release cycles."
"The best feature is the split up between test cases and the test object. This allows us to easily change an error."
"We can write code in Java and it is easy to link to other JARs that we find on the internet, which is very handy."
"I rate Katalon Studio's scalability a four out of five."
"The basic framework and project organization is very good."
"This is a product that is well ahead of its immediate competition in features and functionality."
"The most valuable feature of Katalon Studio is that everything can be managed from one platform."
"Smart Wait and XPath healing are valuable features."
"The tool has a good record and playback feature for functionality, which saves time when creating automated tests."
"The platform's reporting aspects can be broader and include more granular details."
"Katalon Studio could improve having visual testing, but I think they're launching that feature very soon. We would like to see an increase in the usage of AI."
"The price of the solution is a bit high. It's one of the reasons we decided not to continue using the product."
"Now we are having difficulties in using it and had to limit our automation experts to the features that Katalon allows us to use for free. It was free access and they claimed that it would be free for all time."
"Its stability needs improvement."
"Currently, I'm the only one who can use it because I have a Mac. It is giving a hard time to my team members who are on Linux. My team members are using Linux, and Katalon doesn't support Linux very well. It keeps on crashing. It crashes and shuts down almost every time they save their work, so they are not able to use it. It should have good support for Linux. We don't know what the problem is. If the Katalon team can pick up this issue, it will be very helpful."
"It would be helpful to have an automatic save feature."
"There is not much support offered for the free version, which is something that could be improved."
"Katalon Studio should improve its usability, it still needs some improvement where users can easily use it to build their automation suite. It requires some initial work to set it up. There should be more keywords in the library to limit the coding requirements, this will allow a non-technical person easily start using it, which would be better."
ACCELQ Automate is ranked 19th in Test Automation Tools with 1 review while Katalon Studio is ranked 3rd in Test Automation Tools with 42 reviews. ACCELQ Automate is rated 9.0, while Katalon Studio is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of ACCELQ Automate writes "Provides good stability and a valuable object identification feature ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Katalon Studio writes " Functional automation features and the recording functionality saves time but the performance and script execution is slow ". ACCELQ Automate is most compared with Tricentis Tosca, Eggplant Test, Functionize, SmartBear TestComplete and Testsigma, whereas Katalon Studio is most compared with Tricentis Tosca, Postman, OpenText UFT One, Testim and froglogic Squish.
See our list of best Test Automation Tools vendors and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.
We monitor all Test Automation Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.