We performed a comparison between Automic Automation Intelligence and Redwood RunMyJobs based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Workload Automation solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The tool's online manuals and documentation are good. Its user interface is user-friendly."
"The most valuable feature of Automic Automation Intelligence is the ability to see all of the batches from one place. Additionally, there is a multiple scheduler that is useful."
"The Action Packs are a good feature."
"The automated alert response is very useful for long-running and failed jobs during off-business hours."
"Error handling and the recovery feature ensure that my job processes are not stopped if any error occurs."
"Redwood RunMyJobs has been very useful for job scheduling and checking and monitoring jobs."
"We can create and test micro-workflows to find defects sooner."
"This tool helps us to monitor the job related to SAP modules."
"It saves us a lot of time and money by doing jobs automatically."
"Multi-platform scheduling makes it easier this way rather than accessing one platform at a time."
"It has advanced features like dashboards where users can see all statistics."
"Integration of the solution could be improved."
"The solution could benefit by having more connectors and customized widgets. Additionally, a dashboard that people could use for videos would be helpful."
"The job reporting feature needs improvement."
"The product can improve customer service."
"The dashboard provided can be made more visually appealing and could include more critical data that would help associates in one glance get the required information."
"The only issue at first was that we had to manually delete or raise the event in order to run some of the events and wait for jobs, even if the file was kept at the correct AL11 position."
"Having a graphical user interface for the dashboard would be great."
"The product could be better in terms of its monitoring and alert service."
"It lacks some of the common reporting features. I'm a bit surprised that there aren't some standard reports to be able to extract any data on usage. They've described to us that customers have different reporting needs, so they let them develop those, but reporting is a common need. It would be helpful to have it as part of the solution."
"Redwood RunMyJobs should add more good features."
"It has limited reporting features; some basic reporting features are missing."
More Automic Automation Intelligence Pricing and Cost Advice →
Automic Automation Intelligence is ranked 19th in Workload Automation with 3 reviews while Redwood RunMyJobs is ranked 3rd in Workload Automation with 30 reviews. Automic Automation Intelligence is rated 8.6, while Redwood RunMyJobs is rated 9.6. The top reviewer of Automic Automation Intelligence writes "Useful multiple scheduler, centralized batch view, and reliable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Redwood RunMyJobs writes "Simple to use, increases CPU speed, and reduces the cost of machine time". Automic Automation Intelligence is most compared with AppWorx Workload Automation, AutoSys Workload Automation and Automic Workload Automation, whereas Redwood RunMyJobs is most compared with Control-M, Stonebranch, Tidal by Redwood, AutoSys Workload Automation and Fortra's JAMS. See our Automic Automation Intelligence vs. Redwood RunMyJobs report.
See our list of best Workload Automation vendors.
We monitor all Workload Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.