We performed a comparison between AWS WAF and Imperva DDoS based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Web Application Firewall (WAF) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."AWS has flexibility in terms of WAF rules."
"We do not have to maintain the solution."
"The solution is stable."
"This product supplies options for web security for applications accessing sensitive information."
"AWS WAF helps mitigate different kinds of bot attacks and SQL injection that happen within the retail industry."
"This is not a product that you need to install. You just use it."
"AWS WAF is very easy to use and configure on AWS."
"The customizable features are good."
"Technical support provides good, quick responses."
"The three-second service level agreement is already better than the competition."
"They're quite easy to install and quite easy to set up. Clients really like that. Especially when you're dealing with the cloud, it's really easy."
"It fits our requirements, as well as our budget."
"The technical support is excellent."
"On the site security, I can see which countries have incidents, whether it was a robot attack, a real human user, or non-human user."
"It is an effective threat mitigation tool."
"There is no need to have an appliance in house for the services because it is on the cloud."
"They should work to define more threats, add more security, and make it more compliant with more security companies."
"I would like to be able to view a graphical deployment map in the user interface that will give me an overview of the configuration and help to determine whether I have missed any steps."
"In a future release of this solution, I would like to see additional management features to make things simpler."
"For now, there is no feature to protect against attack of the bad bots"
"The technical support does not respond to bugs in the coding of the product."
"AWS WAF should provide better protection to its users, and the security features need to improve."
"The solution's pricing could be improved."
"The serverless product from AWS WAF could be improved. For example, they have only one serverless series, Lambda, but they should extend and improve it. Additionally, the firewall rules are not very easy to configure."
"We had an issue when securing the web applications for DDoS protection."
"It would be better if we were able to manage and apply changes to multiple websites/web applications, and search WAF logs for multiple websites, via the Incapsula dashboard."
"The solution should integrate with something that looks at continuous security management."
"It needs to be improved every time there are new attacks."
"I would like to have support for SSL management and secure DNS."
"Imperva should have more points of presence in Africa."
"I would like to see automated reporting to improve visibility."
"The product could use a broader scope in the area of policies."
AWS WAF is ranked 1st in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 52 reviews while Imperva DDoS is ranked 19th in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 74 reviews. AWS WAF is rated 8.0, while Imperva DDoS is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of AWS WAF writes "A highly stable solution that helps mitigate different kinds of bot attacks and SQL injection attacks". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Imperva DDoS writes "I like the content monitoring feature which I haven't seen in other WAF solutions". AWS WAF is most compared with Azure Web Application Firewall, Microsoft Azure Application Gateway, F5 Advanced WAF, Imperva Web Application Firewall and Sucuri, whereas Imperva DDoS is most compared with Cloudflare, Akamai, Arbor DDoS, Radware DefensePro and Fastly. See our AWS WAF vs. Imperva DDoS report.
See our list of best Web Application Firewall (WAF) vendors.
We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.