We performed a comparison between Basis Testimony [EOL] and OpenText UFT One based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Katalon Studio and others in Regression Testing Tools."It takes less time to complete the regression testing."
"The inside object repository is nice. We can use that and learn it through the ALM connection. That's a good feature. The reporting and smart identification features are also excellent."
"I like the fact that we can use LeanFT with our UFT licenses as well."
"I like the Help feature in UFT One. For example, if you are navigating a particular window, where there are different options. One wouldn’t know the purpose of every option, but there is no need to search because that window contains a Help button. If you click on that Help button, it directly navigates to the respective help needed. VBScript is very easy to understand and easy to prepare scripts with minimal learning curve."
"My company has not had an issue with OpenText UFT One since we have been using it for the past three to four years."
"The stop automation is a great feature."
"It is easy to automate and new personnel can start learning automation using UFT One. You don't have to learn any scripting."
"On a scale of one to ten, I would give OpenText UFT One a 10 because it is a reliable product, it works, it's as good or better than similar solutions especially because you get technical support from real people. Additionally, upgrades are always provided on a consistent basis."
"The most valuable features for us are the GUI, the easy identification of objects, and folder structure creation."
"The GUI and design could be improved."
"We have had some issues with stability, where it crashes sometimes."
"Jumping to functions is supported from any Action/BPT Component code, but not from inside a function library where the target function exists in another library file. Workaround: Select search entire project for the function."
"We'd like it to have less scripting."
"The product should evolve to be flexible so one can use any programming language such as Java and C#, and not just VB script."
"It should consume less CPU, and the licensing cost could be lower."
"Scripting has become more complex from a maintenance standpoint to support additional browsers."
"I'd like to see test case-related reports included in the solution."
"UFT has a recording feature. They could make the recording feature window bigger for whatever activities that I am recording. It would improve the user experience if they could create a separate floating panel (or have it automatically show on the side) once the recording starts."
Earn 20 points
Basis Testimony [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Regression Testing Tools while OpenText UFT One is ranked 2nd in Regression Testing Tools with 89 reviews. Basis Testimony [EOL] is rated 8.0, while OpenText UFT One is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Basis Testimony [EOL] writes "User-friendly regression testing that is fast and offers good support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText UFT One writes "With regularly occurring releases, a QA team member can schedule tests, let the tests run unattended, and then examine the results". Basis Testimony [EOL] is most compared with Tricentis Tosca, whereas OpenText UFT One is most compared with Tricentis Tosca, OpenText UFT Developer, Katalon Studio, SmartBear TestComplete and UiPath Test Suite.
See our list of best Regression Testing Tools vendors.
We monitor all Regression Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
