We performed a comparison between Bitdefender GravityZone Ultra Plus and Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It is stable and scalable."
"This is stable and scalable."
"Additionally, when it comes to EDR, there are more tools available to assist with client work."
"Fortinet is very user-friendly for customers."
"I like FortiClient EMS. FortiEDR has a lot of great features like lockdown mode, remote wipes, and encryption. I can set malware outbreak policies and controls for detecting abnormalities. You can also simulate phishing attacks."
"The most valuable feature is the analysis, because of the beta structure."
"Forensics is a valuable feature of Fortinet FortiEDR."
"The setup is pretty simple."
"I find Bitdefender GravityZone Ultra Plus to be a pretty good solution for the mid-level market, specifically for organizations with up to two hundred fifty users. I like that it is an averagely priced solution. It also has a straightforward installation that can be completed within three to five minutes. Its technical support is also good enough."
"It never fails. Bitdefender always catches all of the viruses that have been detected on customer sites."
"The product is easy to use."
"Bitdefender GravityZone Ultra Plus is highly stable."
"The best thing about Bitdefender is that it has got top-notch features and it is not tied to specific countries like some other antivirus tools."
"The integration with our hypervisor is quite smooth, especially within the Kaspersky Enterprise environment. We have many virtual machines, and the integration is helpful."
"EDR's most valuable feature is its basic protection from malware and viruses."
"Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response is an effective protection solution."
"This is a feature-rich product."
"The solution does a good job of filtering and blocking unusual traffic."
"We compared Kaspersky and Trend Micro. The latter is significantly more expensive. That's the main difference."
"The product has an easy-to-use EDR module based on signature-based antivirus detection. It is a complete software."
"We can scale the solution."
More Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert Pros →
"To improve Fortinet, we need to see more features and technology areas at the endpoint level introduced."
"Integration with Azure and SaaS provisioning tools could improve Fortinet FortiEDR."
"The solution is not stable."
"The solution's installation from a central installation server could be improved because the engineers had a little bit of trouble getting it installed from a central location."
"Everything with Fortinet having to do with their cloud services. They need to invest more in their internal infrastructure that they are running in the cloud. One of the things I find with their cloud environment compared to others' is that they go cheap on the equipment. So it causes some performance degradation."
"Making the portal mobile friendly would be helpful when I am out of office."
"FortiEDR could add a separate scanning dashboard. In incident management, we prefer to remove the endpoint system from the environment and scan the system. We typically use Symantec for that, but if we want to use FortiEDR for that, then we need a scanning tab to clarify things."
"Detections could be improved."
"The mobile version needs improvement."
"Adding a feature like Data Loss Prevention would be beneficial."
"The solution must improve its management features."
"The solution seems to be pretty amateur for an EDR solution, and it should be more in sync in terms of features, with solutions such as FireEye and SentinelOne."
"We would like to have better strategic information."
"It's not a simple implementation."
"An area for improvement in Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response is its technical support because currently, technical support is delayed."
"I am not happy with Kaspersky's support since basic support is very cool unless you pay for some advanced support, in which you get better responses and feedback from Kaspersky's team."
"The solution is expensive."
"Device control is lacking in EDR."
"Documentation needs to be simplified and improved so that it provides good product awareness for end users."
"There's room for improvement in customer service and support. The response time when I open a ticket or communicate with the vendor could be faster."
More Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert Cons →
More Bitdefender GravityZone Ultra Plus Pricing and Cost Advice →
More Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert Pricing and Cost Advice →
Bitdefender GravityZone Ultra Plus is ranked 54th in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) with 5 reviews while Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert is ranked 17th in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) with 44 reviews. Bitdefender GravityZone Ultra Plus is rated 8.0, while Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Bitdefender GravityZone Ultra Plus writes "Easy to use, helps against advanced threats, and enhances the security posture". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert writes "Solid security and performance; overall a useful tool". Bitdefender GravityZone Ultra Plus is most compared with HP Wolf Security, CrowdStrike Falcon, Open EDR, Darktrace and Arista NDR, whereas Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert is most compared with Trend Vision One, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Cynet, IBM Security QRadar and Bitdefender GravityZone EDR. See our Bitdefender GravityZone Ultra Plus vs. Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert report.
See our list of best Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vendors.
We monitor all Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.