We performed a comparison between Boomi iPaaS and SAP Cloud Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The connection configuration part and the drag-and-drop integration module are the most valuable features for me."
"It has been a stable product."
"Extremely flexible for any kind of integration between systems."
"AtomSphere Integration will suit those looking for small automation and simple integrations."
"We work on the flow between systems and the most valuable features for that purpose are the mapping of data, interface mapping, and data integration."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is its monitoring part to debug certain issues and find problems."
"It is easy to learn and implement."
"I like the tool's optimization feature."
"The solution can scale."
"Great Integration Suite, with CPI being its stable component."
"The product improved our company's business operations since we got value out of it."
"The entire SAP ecosystem is a valuable feature. It provides access to SAP S/4HANA, ACG systems, and their Fiori launchpad, making it easy to navigate between them. This makes the enterprise very accessible."
"The mapping transformation allows us to connect our on-premise ECC to the cloud system."
"Feature-wise, I like it since it allows you to integrate with multiple applications. There are available connectors that allow you to integrate."
"The pre-delivered content from the SAP cloud platform is definitely a strength."
"Scalability is one of the benefits that we have in using the product."
"In my experience, I haven't encountered any major issues with the tool. However, there could be a learning curve for new users, especially depending on which tool you're using. For example, I've used MuleSoft in the past, which is more code-oriented and requires knowledge of Java. Transitioning to Boomi AtomSphere Integration took me a couple of months because of differences in terminology."
"There are still some areas that need improvement. For example, when updates are going on, the product becomes very slow."
"It is a costly platform. Its pricing could be better."
"They need to introduce more configurable functions to remove scripting or coding. Scripting should be minimized. It should have exhaustive functions. Currently, it lacks in this aspect."
"The deployment was simple, but the implementation is missing a lot of capabilities."
"There should be more scripting possibilities."
"Boomi AtomSphere Integration is not yet exposed to the world as a good product owing to certain shortcomings in the area of marketing where improvements are required."
"There is no validation in the mapping profile custom scripting, such as IntelliSense or advanced error checking."
"My impression of the stability is that it is not good. Almost every month there is something new and that makes us nervous about delivery."
"The current pricing model is credit-based. We would like to have more information about the usage of the existing applications."
"When I started looking at the client's IT architecture, I started by doing a study of their services, DVM, data volume, and management services. According to the results, they could be a lot better at this."
"The tool's UI is not very intuitive for cloud integration, so it needs research to understand its options and how it may work."
"The solution requires more flexibility overall."
"When they innovate too fast, they end up confusing their customers."
"The product needs improvement for serverless native integrations. They should opt for serverless features as all the customers worldwide choose cloud-based products."
"The product's price is an area of concern where improvements are required."
Boomi iPaaS is ranked 5th in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 25 reviews while SAP Cloud Platform is ranked 4th in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 38 reviews. Boomi iPaaS is rated 7.8, while SAP Cloud Platform is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Boomi iPaaS writes "Stable product, suitable for limited integrations and lacks flexibility ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP Cloud Platform writes "Provides seamless integration with CTI for streamlined data synchronization but complexity and challenges in migrating existing applications to the low-code model for custom application development". Boomi iPaaS is most compared with Microsoft Azure Logic Apps, webMethods Integration Server, SSIS, Oracle Integration Cloud Service and Oracle GoldenGate, whereas SAP Cloud Platform is most compared with Amazon AWS, Microsoft Azure, Google Cloud and webMethods.io Integration. See our Boomi iPaaS vs. SAP Cloud Platform report.
See our list of best Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) vendors.
We monitor all Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.