We performed a comparison between Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP and Symantec Storage Protection based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Palo Alto Networks, Wiz, Microsoft and others in Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP)."When creating cloud infrastructure, Cloud Native Security evaluates the cloud security parameters and how they will impact the organization's risk. It lets us know whether our security parameter conforms to international industry standards. It alerts us about anything that increases our risk, so we can address those vulnerabilities and prevent attacks."
"PingSafe has a dashboard that can detect the criticality of a particular problem, whether it falls under critical, medium, or low vulnerability."
"The UI is very good."
"The UI is responsive and user-friendly."
"We use the infrastructure as code scanning, which is good."
"We like PingSafe's vulnerability assessment and management features, and its vulnerability databases."
"Cloud Native Security's best feature is its ability to identify hard-coded secrets during pull request reviews."
"PingSafe can integrate all your cloud accounts and resources you create in the AWS account, We have set it up to scan the AWS transfer services, EC2, security groups, and GitHub."
"The rulesets and the findings are valuable. The actual core functionality of it and the efficacy of events are great."
"We have more visibility than ever before, appreciating the valuable and proactive insight that we receive from the platform."
"It provides complete visibility of workload hosted on different cloud platforms including AWS and Azure, along with multiple tenants."
"The solution offers an excellent price, benefit, and installation relationship."
"People implementing this solution are concerned with addressing a significant risk, and within the AWS realm, this tool does de-risk substantially."
"This solution helps to keep everything visible, and it also alerts us if something is wrong, such as if someone opened extra ports or services that they are not supposed to. This is a valuable tool for monitoring and maintaining our cloud environment."
"The audit feature is the most valuable for compliance reasons. It gives you a full view of the whole environment, no matter how many accounts you have in AWS or Azure. You have it all under one umbrella."
"The system has deployed security tools to enhance effective investigations in the entire company networking system."
"The most valuable features of this solution are the advanced firewall and malware prevention."
"I would like additional integrations."
"There is room for improvement in the current active licensing model for PingSafe."
"Cloud Native Security's reporting could be better. We are unable to see which images are impacted. Several thousand images have been deployed, so if we can see some application-specific information in the dashboard, we can directly send that report to the team that owns the application. We'd also like the option to download the report from the portal instead of waiting for the report to be sent to our email."
"We can customize security policies but lack auditing capabilities."
"Sometimes the Storyline ID is a bit wacky."
"It would be really helpful if the solution improves its agent deployment process."
"PingSafe is an excellent CSPM tool, but the CWPP features need to improve, and there is a scope for more application security posture management features. There aren't many ASPM solutions on the market, and existing ones are costly. I would like to see PingSafe develop into a single pane of glass for ASPM, CSPM, and CWPP. Another feature I'd like to see is runtime protection."
"Bugs need to be disclosed quickly."
"Compliance checks on cloud resources against various industry standards and compliance framework templates need to be improved."
"The support it provides is not very good. They should improve it since we have had several setbacks due to support issues."
"The accuracy of its remediation is a 7.5 out of 10. Before, I would have given it a ten but now, to handle remediation for fully qualified domain names, it's not working as it did in the past. We're finding some difficulties there."
"The software configurations theory is complicated, and without proper planning and a well-skilled technical team, it cannot perform its tasks properly."
"It should have some options to activate API calls to the platform in the cloud, another improvement would be that when the rules are colonized and they want to be published."
"Timely updates and upgrades to meet modern technological changes could help improve performance and limit the chances of downtime."
"The costs are really high if you want the entire capabilities of the platform."
"There are opportunities for improvement that can be addressed through a roadmap."
"One of the areas that this solution can be improved is in Behavioural monitoring."
More SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP is ranked 5th in Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) with 64 reviews while Symantec Storage Protection is ranked 34th in Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP). Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP is rated 8.6, while Symantec Storage Protection is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP writes "Threat intel integration provides us visibility in case any workload is communicating with suspicious or blacklisted IPs". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Symantec Storage Protection writes "Good technical support, secures our services and mobile devices against malware". Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP is most compared with Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks, Wiz, AWS GuardDuty, Microsoft Defender for Cloud and Qualys VMDR, whereas Symantec Storage Protection is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Cloud.
See our list of best Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) vendors.
We monitor all Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
