We performed a comparison between Check Point CloudGuard WAF and SonarQube based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Application Security Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The first valuable feature is that it is not a complex process to get it up and running. It was not complex at all. We were in a close relationship with the team that developed the app, and it worked in a few hours. The second valuable feature is the information that comes out of it."
"I find the configuration and real-time monitoring features valuable."
"The features I have found most valuable are the comprehensive threat prevention capabilities, automated policy management, and seamless integration with cloud environments."
"The most valuable feature we have found in Check Point CloudGuard WAF is its rich logging capabilities."
"With the solution, we managed to obtain complete comprehensive visibility of the entire environment in the cloud, thus having better control of each of the resources."
"It helps us streamline our revenue streams, and we're spending less money on application security."
"On the endpoint side, the most valuable feature is undoubtedly the cloud-based management capability, along with the ransomware protection, despite not encountering any instances so far."
"It is a highly scalable solution with a quick turnaround time for deployment and running of the software across any IT system."
"We use this solution for qualitative coding. We make use of the SonarLint plugin as well as the dashboard."
"The reporting and the results are quick. It gets integrated within the pipeline well."
"SonarQube is admin friendly."
"My focus is mainly on the DevOps pipeline side of things, and from my perspective, the ease of use and configuration is valuable. It is pretty straightforward to take a deployment pipeline or CI/CD pipeline and integrate SonarQube into it."
"Using SonarQube benefits us because we are able to avoid the inclusion of malware in our applications."
"We consider it a handy tool that helps to resolve our issues immediately."
"The solution offers a very good community edition."
"We are using the Community edition. So, we don't have to incur any licensing costs. This is the best part."
"You need to know exactly the system. You cannot have someone running the system if they don't have the knowledge to do so."
"I advise proactive threat detection intelligence offline, which can also help monitor and ensure system checks and compliances are in place."
"We would like the solution to be more economical since it is not accessible to all clients."
"There should be automation of threat detection, risk mitigation, and report generation."
"In terms of features, I do not have any negatives. Their integration is extremely quick. It is better than others I have been involved with in the past. Their pricing model, however, can be better."
"I feel like I need more clarity in understanding pricing for DDoS protection."
"The coding configurations can be simplified to save time for IT teams and developers."
"We would like to have a solution of this type for the administration of applications from mobile devices."
"A little bit more emphasis on security and a bit more security scanning features would be nice."
"Technical support and the price could be better."
"Monitoring is a feature that can be improved in the next version."
"The product must improve security analysis."
"The solution could improve by having better-consulting services."
"I would also like SonarQube to be able to write custom scanning rules. More documentation would be helpful as well because some of our guys were struggling with the customization script."
"We could use some team support, but since we are using the community version, it's not available."
"SonarQube could improve its static application security testing as per the industry standard."
Check Point CloudGuard WAF is ranked 11th in Application Security Tools with 30 reviews while SonarQube is ranked 1st in Application Security Tools with 112 reviews. Check Point CloudGuard WAF is rated 9.0, while SonarQube is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Check Point CloudGuard WAF writes "Automation capabilities also help streamline security processes and smooths down API integration processes and detects API availability". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SonarQube writes "Easy to integrate and has a plug-in that supports both C and C++ languages". Check Point CloudGuard WAF is most compared with Checkmarx One, whereas SonarQube is most compared with Checkmarx One, SonarCloud, Coverity, Veracode and GitHub Advanced Security. See our Check Point CloudGuard WAF vs. SonarQube report.
See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors.
We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
