We performed a comparison between Check Point Remote Access VPN and Claroty Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about TeamViewer, Microsoft, Citrix and others in Remote Access."We have more control over the activity that users have on the internal network, thanks to the monitoring offered by Check Point and the security provided by the gateway."
"Our number of users working remotely vastly increased during the COVID 19 pandemic. Check Point Remote Access VPN allowed us to quickly make the transition from in-office to remote work."
"It can improve an organization by providing secure access to resources for traveling employees, which can help to reduce the risk of data breaches or other security incidents."
"The most important feature of Check Point Remote Access VPN is the multiple factor authentication."
"The IPSec VPN, Mobile Access, and Identity Awareness are three of the blades with which we have been working with since the pandemic. This has given us great mobility, making our network more dynamic."
"The team has full visibility of the users that connect allowing them to keep control of who is in the network and what data they are allowing to come in and out."
"The solution implemented in the cloud allows us to easily scale in cases of user increase."
"The safety of online interactions when working with this product has enabled members to convene productive meetings without fear of being attacked."
"The product helps mitigate potential threats, especially if its users have signature rules. The product also provides alerts."
"The main advantage of Claroty, when compared to its competitors, is integrated secure remote access."
"Price category and smooth renewal of agreement should be considered for flawless and quick onboarding of clients and partners."
"The client-side UI is fundamental, and there is nothing to see."
"Sometimes we have some small problems with Check Point Remote Access VPN. For example, problems with authentication."
"Generally, the license is included with the Check Point gateway licensing, however, in terms of the number of users that can be activated for use, it is generally five users."
"We are very happy with the Windows client. You log in with the VPN for the full client, you do the log in there. But for Linux machines, they don't have a full client to install. It is important because we have some users that use Linux and they don't have a specific application from Check Point to use. That is something that could be improved."
"The provisioning of VPN users has room for improvement."
"We encounter challenges for the product’s installation and troubleshooting processes compared to other VPN products."
"We'd like to integrate Check Point into the Remote Access VPN solution and have the ability to integrate multiple devices as access points through the solution."
"The product's integration capabilities are an area of concern where improvements are required."
"Claroty Platform could improve the pricing to get more acceptability in the market."
More Check Point Remote Access VPN Pricing and Cost Advice →
Check Point Remote Access VPN is ranked 5th in Remote Access with 62 reviews while Claroty Platform is ranked 23rd in Remote Access with 2 reviews. Check Point Remote Access VPN is rated 8.8, while Claroty Platform is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Check Point Remote Access VPN writes "Is easy to use and has a nice interface, but the scalability needs to improve". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Claroty Platform writes "Provides good visibility of the devices in a user's environment". Check Point Remote Access VPN is most compared with OpenVPN Access Server, Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client, Fortinet FortiClient, Check Point Harmony Mobile and Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange, whereas Claroty Platform is most compared with Nozomi Networks, Tenable OT Security, Dragos, Darktrace and Armis.
See our list of best Remote Access vendors.
We monitor all Remote Access reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.