We performed a comparison between Check Point SandBlast Network and Fortinet FortiSandbox based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The Check Point SandBlast Network gives us incredibly good features."
"The main feature of the solution is that it protects against malicious threats from the outside."
"Very few false positives are detected, which gives the confidence to raise flags when needed, ensuring the IT department is aware of threats and acting fast."
"The most efficient and protective characteristics of Check Point's SandBlast solution are that we can see a lot of this protection at the network and mail levels."
"The solution can detect and prevent attacks that may be encrypted."
"In terms of the scalability, it's expandable across the cloud."
"It saves time with us trying to do the analysis. We use it to try to find out how something got into the network. We use it to stop something before it ever gets in."
"SandBlast updates the threat signatures frequently."
"The GUI makes administration tasks straightforward."
"The product is great. It can be deployed on the cloud or on-premises."
"The real-time analysis capability of FortiSandbox is beneficial for email analysis."
"The most valuable features of Fortinet FortiSandbox are customization, ICAP protocol, and integration with other vendors. Additionally, the security work very well."
"One of the valuable features is its ability to detect new threats."
"It is an easily scalable solution."
"The technical support is very good."
"The solution is easy to manage."
"I would like if it could emulate bigger files and somehow improve this usability. I don't know if this would be possible. However, if it was able to scan or emulate bigger files, then it would be safer for a company using it."
"Most of the time stability is okay, but sometimes, we're not able to contact the cloud. It won't last for long. The product could be faster."
"The initial setup was complex because of the lack of information from the consultant."
"There should be some improvement in the solution's stability and scalability."
"In Check Point SandBlast, improvement has to be made with respect to the GUI."
"I imagine there will be improvements in later versions. There are hotfixes that come out all the time."
"The guides or best practices of Check Point are difficult to find for the client. Therefore, it is sometimes difficult to make better implementations."
"I would like to see these solutions being easier to manage from mobile applications - from either iOS or Android - including other operating systems that appear in the future."
"Fortinet FortiSandbox should improve its performance and security accuracy to keep competitive with other solutions, such as IBM."
"The licensing can be very confusing. It needs to be simplified."
"At least once a week we have a false alarm. This needs to be adjusted so that we get fewer of these occurrences."
"Fortinet FortiSandbox can improve by decreasing the time of analysis response. Other solutions have a better response time, such as WildFire."
"For the MSSPs, it would be great if the product could display all the threat chains on a dashboard since it is an area where the tool is currently lacking."
"The response time from technical support should be improved."
"I would like to have machine learning added to the solution in a future release."
"Product could include a user interface and be made simpler for customers to configure."
More Check Point SandBlast Network Pricing and Cost Advice →
Check Point SandBlast Network is ranked 8th in Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) with 33 reviews while Fortinet FortiSandbox is ranked 4th in Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) with 36 reviews. Check Point SandBlast Network is rated 8.4, while Fortinet FortiSandbox is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Check Point SandBlast Network writes "High detection with few false positives and able to handle large volumes of data". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Fortinet FortiSandbox writes "Light and powerful solution design; useful to have". Check Point SandBlast Network is most compared with Palo Alto Networks WildFire, Cisco Secure Network Analytics, Microsoft Defender for Office 365, Trellix Network Detection and Response and Symantec Advanced Threat Protection, whereas Fortinet FortiSandbox is most compared with Palo Alto Networks WildFire, Trellix Network Detection and Response, Microsoft Defender for Office 365, Fortinet FortiEDR and VMRay. See our Check Point SandBlast Network vs. Fortinet FortiSandbox report.
See our list of best Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) vendors.
We monitor all Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.