We performed a comparison between Checkmarx One and Contrast Security Protect based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Application Security Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The SAST component was absolutely 100% stable."
"Our static operation security has been able to identify more security issues since implementing this solution."
"The solution allows us to create custom rules for code checks."
"The user interface is excellent. It's very user friendly."
"The most valuable features are the easy to understand interface, and it 's very user-friendly."
"The solution communicates where to fix the issue for the purpose of less iterations."
"Vulnerability details is valuable."
"It gives the proper code flow of vulnerabilities and the number of occurrences."
"The product gives a few false positives. We get 99 percent true positives."
"The solution has excellent real-time capabilities."
"Protect provides us with more in-depth visibility into ongoing attacks."
"C, C++, VB and T-SQL are not supported by this product. Although, C and C++ were advertised as being supported."
"I would like the product to include more debugging and developed tools. It needs to also add enhancements on the coding side."
"They could work to improve the user interface. Right now, it really is lacking."
"The cost per user is high and should be reduced."
"Checkmarx could improve the REST APIs by including automation."
"Checkmarx reports many false positives that we need to manually segregate and mark “Not exploitable”."
"Its user interface could be improved and made more friendly."
"The product can be improved by continuing to expand the application languages and frameworks that can be scanned for vulnerabilities. This includes expanded coverage for mobile applications as well as open-source development tools."
"Protect's reporting GUI is very basic. To get all statuses from the APIs, we needed to write our own KPI dashboard to provide reports."
"There's room for improvement in the initial setup."
"Contrast Security Protect needs to improve integration."
Checkmarx One is ranked 3rd in Application Security Tools with 67 reviews while Contrast Security Protect is ranked 32nd in Application Security Tools with 3 reviews. Checkmarx One is rated 7.6, while Contrast Security Protect is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Checkmarx One writes "The report function is a great, configurable asset but sometimes yields false positives". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Contrast Security Protect writes "It provides us with more in-depth visibility into ongoing attacks". Checkmarx One is most compared with SonarQube, Veracode, Fortify on Demand, Snyk and Coverity, whereas Contrast Security Protect is most compared with SonarQube, Fortify on Demand, Snyk, Tenable.io Web Application Scanning and Sonatype Lifecycle. See our Checkmarx One vs. Contrast Security Protect report.
See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors.
We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.