We performed a comparison between Checkmarx One and Fortra Tripwire IP360 based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Vulnerability Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The main thing we find valuable about Checkmarx is the ease of use. It's easy to initiate scans and triage defects."
"The solution is scalable, but other solutions are better."
"The most valuable feature is the simple user interface."
"What I like best about Checkmarx is that it has fewer false positives than other products, giving you better results."
"We use the solution for dynamic application testing."
"The setup is very easy. There is a lot of information in the documents which makes the install not difficult at all."
"The main benefit to using this solution is that we find vulnerabilities in our software before the development cycle is complete."
"The best thing about Checkmarx is the amount of vulnerabilities that it can find compared to other free tools."
"Tripwire IP360 is a very stable solution."
"It's become the pinnacle point for anything that enters the network or anything that's passing through to production to first be affected by IP360, hardened, and up to standard. For our integrity management, one was deployed in the bank about two years ago and that's still going to expand the usage and the product itself. That will go hand in hand with training and expanding the product as for where it's deployed."
"We could manage our entire IP range with the solution."
"As the solution becomes more complex and feature rich, it takes more time to debug and resolve problems. Feature-wise, we have no complaints, but Checkmarx becomes harder to maintain as the product becomes more complex. When I talk to support, it takes them longer to fix the problem than it used to."
"The cost per user is high and should be reduced."
"The solution sometimes reports a false auditable code or false positive."
"They could work to improve the user interface. Right now, it really is lacking."
"The interactive application security testing, or IAST, the interactive part where you're looking at an application that lives in a runtime environment on a server or virtual machine, needs improvement."
"I would like to see the rate of false positives reduced."
"Its pricing model can be improved. Sometimes, it is a little complex to understand its pricing model."
"I expect application security vendors to cover all aspects of application security, including SAST, DAST, and even mobile application security testing. And it would be much better if they provided an on-premises and cloud option for all these main application security features."
"We need to dedicate time and resources to keep it running."
"The reporting functions can use improvement. There is room for growth because reporting functions differ a lot depending on what you're going to output. It depends on whether it's for technical or senior management and how it's interpreted. There could be growth within the reporting functionality side."
"I am not very impressed by the technical support."
Checkmarx One is ranked 11th in Vulnerability Management with 67 reviews while Fortra Tripwire IP360 is ranked 40th in Vulnerability Management with 6 reviews. Checkmarx One is rated 7.6, while Fortra Tripwire IP360 is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of Checkmarx One writes "The report function is a great, configurable asset but sometimes yields false positives". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Fortra Tripwire IP360 writes "The solution helps users to manage their entire IP range, but it's unreliable and very expensive to maintain". Checkmarx One is most compared with SonarQube, Veracode, Fortify on Demand, Snyk and Coverity, whereas Fortra Tripwire IP360 is most compared with Tenable Nessus. See our Checkmarx One vs. Fortra Tripwire IP360 report.
See our list of best Vulnerability Management vendors.
We monitor all Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.