We performed a comparison between CucumberStudio and GitHub CoPilot based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Rapid Application Development Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."CucumberStudio has a very user-friendly interface."
"The data table that helps in converting a single script to multiple test cases is very helpful."
"The best thing is that a person without knowledge about the program can easily understand what happened in our testing process."
"The product is easy to integrate."
"GitHub CoPilot helps us auto-complete code. The tool's context awareness benefits our projects because it identifies the context in which we are working and automatically proposes solutions that we use."
"GitHub CoPilot has good stability and performance."
"Initially, OpenAI is free, but you'll need to pay for it later."
"The most valuable aspects in terms of features, revolve around its code generation capabilities."
"The initial setup of the product is easy."
"The document generation features are valuable."
"The product's most valuable feature is vulnerability management features."
"I think it would be better if we could also do the reporting with CucumberStudio."
"The reporting needs to be improved."
"I would like to see better customer support."
"There's room for improvement to ensure that suggestions align more precisely with the context of what I'm seeking, minimizing instances of unrelated or inaccurate code suggestions."
"In certain instances, OpenAI didn't respond in the expected way. The responses were more general and didn't address the specific point."
"GitHub CoPilot's alerting features need improvement."
"The suggestions provided by the product must be improved."
"GitHub CoPilot's stability is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"In a few cases, the results aren't correct, so that needs improvement. Also, it would be great if the results could be presented in different formats, not just text. As engineers, it takes time to read through text-based results."
"GitHub CoPilot’s integration with other solutions could be improved."
"The product's price is an area of concern where improvements are required."
CucumberStudio is ranked 29th in Rapid Application Development Software with 9 reviews while GitHub CoPilot is ranked 15th in Rapid Application Development Software with 11 reviews. CucumberStudio is rated 8.0, while GitHub CoPilot is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of CucumberStudio writes "An easy -to -use scalable cloud-based solution which needs some improvement with programming automation and stability". On the other hand, the top reviewer of GitHub CoPilot writes "Though it offers good integration features, the price needs to be lowered". CucumberStudio is most compared with , whereas GitHub CoPilot is most compared with GitLab, Oracle Application Express (APEX), Pega BPM and ServiceNow. See our CucumberStudio vs. GitHub CoPilot report.
See our list of best Rapid Application Development Software vendors.
We monitor all Rapid Application Development Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.