We performed a comparison between Cyware Security Orchestration Layer and IBM Resilient based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Palo Alto Networks, Splunk and others in Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR)."There are a lot of things you can explore as a user. You can even go and actively hunt for threats. You can go on the offensive rather than on the defensive."
"The automation feature is valuable."
"Previously, it was a little bit difficult to find where an incident came from, including which IP address and which country. So in Sentinel, it's very easy to find where the incident came from since we can easily get the information from the dashboard, after which we take action quickly."
"The AI and ML of Azure Sentinel are valuable. We can use machine learning models at the tenant level and within Office 365 and Microsoft stack. We don't need to depend upon any other connectors. It automatically provisions the native Microsoft products."
"Another area where it is helping us is in creating a single dashboard for our environment. We can collect all the logs into a log analytics workset and run queries on top of it. We get all the results in the dashboard. Even a layman can understand this stuff. The way Microsoft presents it is really incredible."
"The native integration of the Microsoft security solution has been essential because it helps reduce some false positives, especially with some of the impossible travel rules that may be configured in Microsoft 365. For some organizations, that might be benign because they're using VPNs, etc."
"The SOAR playbooks are Sentinel's most valuable feature. It gives you a unified toolset for detecting, investigating, and responding to incidents. That's what clearly differentiates Sentinels from its competitors. It's cloud-native, offering end-to-end coverage with more than 120 connectors. All types of data logs can be poured into the system so analysis can happen. That end-to-end visibility gives it the advantage."
"The solution has features that helped improve the security posture of our clients. It provides the ability to correlate a large variety of log sources very cost-effectively, especially for Microsoft sources."
"The technical support team is helpful."
"IBM Resilient is scalable."
"The most valuable thing about it is how easy it is to navigate the user interface."
"The solution is easy to use."
"The initial setup of IBM Resilient is not that complex since my company already has a support license that we use internally. In general, the product's deployment phase is not that complex."
"Its flexibility is the most valuable."
"It's really simple and has a flexible interface."
"The UBA, User Behavior Analytics, is very good."
"The solution is simple to use and to integrate with IBM QRadar."
"The reporting could be more structured."
"I think the number one area of improvement for Sentinel would be the cost."
"I would like Sentinel to have more out-of-the-box analytics rules. There are already more than 400 rules, but they could add more industry-specific ones. For example, you could have sets of out-of-the-box rules for banking, financial sector, insurance, automotive, etc., so it's easier for people to use it out of the box. Structuring the rules according to industry might help us."
"Sentinel's reporting is complex and can be more user-friendly."
"We are invoiced according to the amount of data generated within each log."
"If we want to use more features, we have to pay more. There are multiple solutions on the cloud itself, but the pricing model package isn't consistent, which is confusing to clients."
"The troubleshooting has room for improvement."
"The interface could be more user-friendly. It''s a small improvement that they could make if they wanted to."
"The prices must be reduced."
"The initial setup is complex."
"The implementation could be a bit simpler."
"There are shortcomings with IBM Resilient's technical support team that can be considered for improvement in the future."
"The tool needs to improve its documentation on license scripts."
"One thing to improve is how it handles data formats, which currently might require scripting for conversion to CSV before uploading."
"It is not very straightforward to set up custom integrations, especially with services like Azure. You need an additional server for integration."
"What could make IBM Resilient better is if IBM increased the number of built-in integrations with different products from other vendors or third-party products."
"The ability to analyze incidents needs to be improved in the solution."
Cyware Security Orchestration Layer is ranked 22nd in Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) with 1 review while IBM Resilient is ranked 8th in Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) with 17 reviews. Cyware Security Orchestration Layer is rated 9.0, while IBM Resilient is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Cyware Security Orchestration Layer writes "A stable solution with excellent features and a helpful technical support team". On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM Resilient writes "Simple deployment, scalable, but lacking third-party solution compatibility ". Cyware Security Orchestration Layer is most compared with , whereas IBM Resilient is most compared with Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR, Splunk SOAR, ServiceNow Security Operations, IBM Security QRadar and IBM Cloud Pak for Security.
See our list of best Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) vendors.
We monitor all Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
