We performed a comparison between Datadog and VMware Tanzu Observability by Wavefront based on our users’ reviews in four categories. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.
Features: Datadog is recognized for its advantageous attributes including customizable visualizations, bug identification, user-friendly interface for developers, integration capabilities, log analysis, and troubleshooting abilities. Additionally, it offers high performance and flexibility. VMware Tanzu Observability by Wavefront is commended for its effortless installation, compatibility with various solutions, support for container platforms, swift data processing, enhanced visibility, and exceptional support provided by VMware. Datadog could enhance usability, integration, user interface intuitiveness, external website monitoring, SSL security, and setup complexity. VMware Tanzu Observability by Wavefront could improve its billing model, customization of dashboards, documentation, and initial setup process.
Service and Support: Users have generally praised the customer service of Datadog, noting its availability and promptness. However, there have been occasional cases where support was slow or unresponsive. VMware Tanzu Observability by Wavefront has received mixed feedback. Some users did not require support, while others experienced assistance at varying levels of satisfaction.
Ease of Deployment: Reviewers have found the initial setup for Datadog to be simple and uncomplicated, often receiving help from service providers or technical support. The setup process for VMware Tanzu differs among users, with some finding it effortless and speedy, while others perceive it as more intricate, necessitating technical proficiency and collaboration from multiple teams.
Pricing: Users have different opinions about the setup cost of Datadog, with some finding it pricey and others finding it reasonable. However, the pricing model is unclear and lacks documentation. VMware Tanzu is also deemed expensive, with high licensing expenses for integrations and additional features.
Comparison Results: Datadog is the preferred choice when compared to VMware Tanzu Observability by Wavefront. Users appreciate Datadog's easy setup, user-friendly interface, extensive integrations, and valuable features such as dashboards, error reporting, log centralization, and troubleshooting capabilities. The flexibility, performance, and observability provided by Datadog are also highly praised.
"Its logs are most valuable."
"They have a very good foundation in capturing metrics, logs, and traces. It's a very nice tool for that and it allows you to apply these monitoring tools in almost any technology."
"The full stack of integrations made it easier to monitor the different technologies and platform providers, including Software as a Service providers, that otherwise would need a lot of work and customization to be able to see what is happening."
"We enjoy the multistep API tests."
"Having a clear view, not only of our infrastructure but our apps and services as well, has brought a great added value to our customers."
"Datadog is providing efficiency in the products we develop for the wireless device engineering department."
"It has enhanced the performance of my team."
"Datadog documentation on web pages has improved a lot and is pretty easy to follow and find."
"Tanzu itself, integrated with multiple solutions, bestows support and security upon a container platform, especially when it comes to managing open-source container platforms such as Kubernetes."
"The solution is great for virtualization and preparing the infrastructure in Tanzu to test products. It's very fast and has good visibility."
"For us, the ease of deployment in combination with TMZ was the most important part because we don't have to manually deploy a complex monitoring solution. We can more or less do that with the click of a button, and we are not dependent on the developers to provide us with all the necessary features and functions to make that work. We can just deploy it on a workload cluster and monitor at least a good part of the workload. If we want to go into detail, we clearly need to make changes, but for a good part of application monitoring, it gives us good insights."
"People are very pleased with the implementation."
"No issues with stability."
"The features I find most valuable is the querying and alerting capabilities."
"VMware comes with a support team, and if you have trouble, you can easily create a ticket, and VMware will help you. Therefore, the best aspect is the support."
"The most valuable aspects of the solution are its ease of use and its ease of implementation."
"If there were a more cost-effective manner of deploying the tool, we'd be more likely to adopt it more widely."
"There is always room for improvement when dealing with cloud-based technologies. Mainly, I would say, it's just increasing our offerings to attract various other types of industries and businesses across more fields."
"Datadog does not have the feature where you can monitor external websites or check the SSL secure for websites."
"It seems that admin cost control granularity is an afterthought."
"While the tool is robust with many different capabilities, users would greatly benefit from more examples in the documentation."
"Since the Datadog platform has so many separate features, solving so many use cases, there are often inconsistencies in feature availability and interoperability between products."
"Datadog could be improved if it could detect other software in a container or server."
"I'm not sure if Datadog can monitor K8s deployments in real-time. For instance, being able to see a deployment step by step visually. This would be helpful if there were any incidents during the deployment."
"In the new version, I would love to see more prediction capabilities. It would be great if one could see the alerts get a little more enriched with information and become more human-friendly instead of the technical stuff that they put in there. I think those would be really awesome outcomes to get."
"They could make it more easy to plug-in data so that a nontechnical person will be able to use it, like accountants or finance people. That way they don't have to ask us."
"Its billing model is consumption-based. I understand the consumption-based model, but it is not necessarily easy to estimate and guess how many points or how much we are going to consume on a specific application up until we get to that point. So, for us, it would be helpful to have more insights or predictability into what we can expect from a cost perspective if we are starting to use specific features. This can potentially also drive our consumption a bit more."
"The initial setup should be easier and more seamless."
"The main problem I have is that the license cost is very high."
"It could use a URL document server. Everything in the market is moving towards automation and everybody's looking for the single click operations as well relational data locality."
"The documentation and integration with Kubernetes could be improved."
"The implementation is a long process that should be improved."
More VMware Aria Operations for Applications Pricing and Cost Advice →
Datadog is ranked 1st in Cloud Monitoring Software with 137 reviews while VMware Aria Operations for Applications is ranked 29th in Cloud Monitoring Software with 9 reviews. Datadog is rated 8.6, while VMware Aria Operations for Applications is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Datadog writes "Very good RUM, synthetics, and infrastructure host maps". On the other hand, the top reviewer of VMware Aria Operations for Applications writes "Easy to deploy, worth the money, and helpful for uptime monitoring and performance insights". Datadog is most compared with Dynatrace, Azure Monitor, New Relic, AWS X-Ray and Elastic Observability, whereas VMware Aria Operations for Applications is most compared with Grafana, Dynatrace, Zabbix, AppDynamics and ServiceNow IT Operations Management. See our Datadog vs. VMware Aria Operations for Applications report.
See our list of best Cloud Monitoring Software vendors, best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors, and best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.
We monitor all Cloud Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.