We performed a comparison between Fortinet FortiSOAR and Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."I like the unified security console. You can close incidents using Sentinel in all other Microsoft Security portals, when it comes to incident response."
"The most valuable features in my experience are the UEBA, LDAP, the threat scheduler, and integration with third-party straight perform like the MISP."
"The native integration of the Microsoft security solution has been essential because it helps reduce some false positives, especially with some of the impossible travel rules that may be configured in Microsoft 365. For some organizations, that might be benign because they're using VPNs, etc."
"The Log analytics are useful."
"The solution has features that helped improve the security posture of our clients. It provides the ability to correlate a large variety of log sources very cost-effectively, especially for Microsoft sources."
"Sentinel is a SIEM and SOAR tool, so its automation is the best feature; we can reduce human interaction, freeing up our human resources."
"Microsoft Sentinel comes preloaded with templates for teaching and analytics rules."
"The in-built SOAR of Sentinel is valuable. Kusto Query Language is also valuable for the ease of writing queries and ease of getting insights from the logs. Schedule-based queries within Sentinel are also valuable. I found these three features most useful for my projects."
"The reputation of the brand is very good."
"The product can be automated for network security purposes. The solution offers a great security automation response."
"The solution is easy to implement and includes 450 built-in connectors."
"We use the product for security."
"It has a quick detection and response time."
"It's great that the solution is integrated with FortiAnalyzer."
"It is a scalable solution...The implementation phase of the product was not tough or difficult."
"The most valuable feature of Fortinet FortiSOAR is the number of available connectors and the simplicity to start to automate."
"Its agility and scalability are valuable."
"It is quite scalable. I would rate it a ten out of ten."
"The product’s stability is good."
"It is a scalable solution."
"The solution is very reliable."
"The most valuable feature is automation."
"The most valuable features are simplicity and ease of integration."
"I am satisfied with the product overall."
"Given that I am in the small business space, I wish they would make it easier to operate Sentinel without being a Sentinel expert. Examples of things that could be easier are creating alerts and automations from scratch and designing workbooks."
"They're giving us the queries so we can plug them right into Sentinel. They need to have a streamlined process for updating them in the tool and knowing when things are updated and knowing when there are new detections available from Microsoft."
"The solution should allow for a streamlined CI/CD procedure."
"We'd like to see more connectors."
"Sometimes, we are observing large ingestion delays. We expect logs within 5 minutes, but it takes about 10 to 15 minutes."
"Microsoft Sentinel is relatively expensive, and its cost should be improved."
"If Sentinel had a graphical user interface, it would be easier to use. I would also like it to be more customizable."
"There is room for improvement in entity behavior and the integration site."
"Fortinet FortiSOAR should add more documentation for some use cases."
"Fortinet FortiSOAR's dashboard is not easy to understand."
"The solution doesn't connect well with the network devices."
"Fortinet FortiSOAR should improve its analysis."
"The technology and integrations are important so should continue to be enhanced."
"The area that needs improvement is integration with multiple third-party vendors."
"Fortinet's tech support overall is not great when they are at their best."
"Technical support could be improved."
"Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR could improve the look, feel, and management of the cloud console. Additionally, the user could be more easily integrated."
"The tool’s multi-tenancy feature must be improved."
"I would like to see Cortex become less dependent on Active Directory and group policies to manage the deployment. Maybe I need to update my understanding of how to deploy it, but that's the way I know how to use it."
"The solution requires DV but does not support open-source DV elastic searches."
"XSOAR could have more integration options."
"The dashboard could be better."
"The solution's technical support could be better."
"Corex XSOAR could be improved by reducing the time it takes to process large amounts of data and increasing the number of integrations."
More Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR Pricing and Cost Advice →
Fortinet FortiSOAR is ranked 10th in Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) with 12 reviews while Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR is ranked 2nd in Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) with 42 reviews. Fortinet FortiSOAR is rated 7.4, while Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Fortinet FortiSOAR writes "A stable solution that has a number of available connectors and is simple to automate". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR writes "Enables the investigators to go through the review process a lot quicker". Fortinet FortiSOAR is most compared with Splunk SOAR, Swimlane, ServiceNow Security Operations, IBM Resilient and Cisco SecureX, whereas Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR is most compared with Cortex XSIAM, Splunk SOAR, Swimlane, ServiceNow Security Operations and IBM Resilient. See our Fortinet FortiSOAR vs. Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR report.
See our list of best Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) vendors.
We monitor all Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.