We performed a comparison between HPE Ezmeral Container Platform and Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Red Hat, Amazon Web Services (AWS), VMware and others in Container Management."If customers focus on primary apps or if they are using them for data science, this is a good solution."
"OpenShift provides tools that tell me everything I have on a container, and I can make it on-premise or on a cloud infrastructure."
"Dashboards... give us all the details we need to see about the microservices."
"More tools are available in OpenShift Container Platform to maintain and manage the clusters."
"It is very lightweight and can be deployed very fast, especially when it comes to containers."
"Autoscaling is an excellent feature that makes it very simple to scale our applications as required."
"I think it's a pretty scalable tool...The solution's technical support has been pretty good."
"The solution is stable. However, it depends on the integrations of the solution on how stable it will be, such as what tools you integrate with."
"The most valuable feature for me in the OpenShift Container Platform is the option to manage different containers and environments and also being able to switch among them."
"The modernization in Ezmeral could be improved."
"Things are there and the documentation is there, however, there still needs to be quick guides available."
"The solution needs to introduce open ID connect integration for role-based access control."
"OpenShift Container Platform could improve by having better integration."
"There should be a simplification of the overall cluster environment. It should require fewer resources. Just to run a simple Hello World app, it requires about seven servers, and that's just crazy. I understand that it is fully redundant, but it's prohibitively expensive to get something simple going."
"OpenShift needs to improve their container storage."
"There is room for improvement with integration."
"It can take 10 to 15 minutes to deploy a microservice. The CI/CD process takes a long time, and if it's because of OCP, that is something that can be changed."
"With the recent trend of cloud-native, fully managed serverless services, I don't see much documentation about how a customer should move from on-prem to the cloud, or what is the best way to do a lift-and-shift. Even if you are on AWS OCP, which is self-managed infra services, and you want to use the ROSA managed services, what is the best way to achieve that migration? I don't see documentation for these kinds of use cases from Red Hat."
More Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform Pricing and Cost Advice →
HPE Ezmeral Container Platform is ranked 16th in Container Management while Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform is ranked 1st in Container Management with 37 reviews. HPE Ezmeral Container Platform is rated 7.0, while Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of HPE Ezmeral Container Platform writes "Easy to install with good support, but the deployment of applications could be simplified". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform writes "Provides automation that speeds up our process by 30% and helps us achieve zero downtime". HPE Ezmeral Container Platform is most compared with Kubernetes, Amazon EKS, VMware Tanzu Mission Control, Google Kubernetes Engine and Docker, whereas Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform is most compared with Amazon EKS, VMware Tanzu Mission Control, Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE, Amazon Elastic Container Service and Microsoft Defender for Cloud.
See our list of best Container Management vendors.
We monitor all Container Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.