We performed a comparison between HPE Wireless WAN and Ruckus Wireless WAN based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Wireless WAN solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable feature of this solution is flexibility."
"The WiFi and high scalability are the most valuable features."
"We've found the scalability to be good."
"The most valuable features of this solution are it supports the newest virus technology, which helps with bandwidth, and is very stable."
"What's most valuable in HPE Wireless WAN is that it works fine for customers with existing HPE controllers."
"The most valuable features of HPE Wireless WAN are high quality and capability."
"The tool is easy to manage."
"The support has been responsive and helpful."
"The stability provided is very nice."
"The actual wireless access points themselves are very powerful."
"It's highly scalable as long as the licenses are in place. You can expand it easily."
"The connectivity is good. There's no lag at all in service."
"We found the technical support to be helpful."
"The feature I like most, is the product activity."
"Tech support is good."
"The performance of this solution is amazing in terms of radiofrequency technology."
"In the next release of the solution, there should be better integration with other platforms."
"The HPE Wireless dashboard could be more user-friendly."
"HPE Wireless WAN could provide better access points and better pricing."
"Scalability is an aspect of this product that should be improved."
"The price of HPE Wireless WAN should be reduced."
"It's very old-fashioned, which is why we have made the decision to replace it."
"It should be a faster device."
"The scalability is good, but it could improve."
"The documentation they do have is very difficult to understand. There should be some scenarios, deployments, complications, or techniques to follow. They are inadequate in that regard, and the documentation needs to be greatly improved."
"Ruckus Wireless WAN we have a lot of component shortages in the world. This has impacted deliveries. We have large back orders of the solution."
"The GUI interface of Ruckus Wireless WAN could be more usable, especially the drag-and-drop feature."
"The solution's AI offering and pricing could be improved."
"The pricing of Ruckus Wireless WAN is an area of concern. Ruckus Wireless WAN should slash its current price to match the prices offered by its competitors."
"I would like to see built-in Wi-Fi."
"The interface has to be more automated."
"The captive portal should be more customizable because right now, it is very limited."
HPE Wireless WAN is ranked 7th in Wireless WAN with 18 reviews while Ruckus Wireless WAN is ranked 2nd in Wireless WAN with 45 reviews. HPE Wireless WAN is rated 7.8, while Ruckus Wireless WAN is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of HPE Wireless WAN writes " A tool that ensures to provide seamless connectivity to its users". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Ruckus Wireless WAN writes " Offers robust outdoor connectivity, but signal strength and support need improvement". HPE Wireless WAN is most compared with , whereas Ruckus Wireless WAN is most compared with Ubiquiti Wireless and Cambium Networks Wireless WAN. See our HPE Wireless WAN vs. Ruckus Wireless WAN report.
See our list of best Wireless WAN vendors.
We monitor all Wireless WAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.