We performed a comparison between IBM Guardium Vulnerability Assessment and Tenable Vulnerability Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Vulnerability Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable feature is that it provides a simple English recommendation on actions that you need to take once a vulnerability is discovered."
"The reporting features are good and there are many built-in reports that can be quickly configured."
"It helped with some of the regulatory requirements. It also helped with some of the security analytics and analysis. It was worthwhile from that perspective."
"It is easy to manage. Most of the information the tool provided helped to further investigate the vulnerability and its impact."
"The product is easy to use."
"The initial setup is straightforward so long as your infrastructure, components, and networks are in place."
"The solution is quite friendly."
"Tenable.io Vulnerability Management is an easy-to-use product. I"
"It is a stable solution. Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
"The initial setup is pretty straightforward."
"It is a very, very user-friendly tool...The setup is easy"
"Building policies is not that easy. There are some things that are turned off by default, for example, displaying values."
"It was not as easy to use. The user-friendliness of it was somewhat lower than what I was expecting. It was also lacking in terms of the ease of the setup. There should be an automatic agent for deployment."
"The interface could be improved by having sub-groups of tests, ultimately making the process of collecting tests faster."
"I don't recommend Tenable.io Vulnerability Management for web scanning"
"Tenable.io Vulnerability Management could be improved with an increased number of dashboards and MSSP integration."
"It would be helpful if Tenable could be more clear with regard to everything the solution can and cannot do with the particular license that you have."
"The shortcoming of the solution that needs improvement is related to its capability to do vulnerability assessments on applications."
"The solution is a bit slow."
"The product is a bit expensive."
"The solution’s pricing could be improved."
"An area of improvement for this solution is being able to customize the dashboard. For example, the dashboard does not allow us to view a previous months vulnerability results alongside current results to make comparisons."
More IBM Guardium Vulnerability Assessment Pricing and Cost Advice →
More Tenable Vulnerability Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
IBM Guardium Vulnerability Assessment is ranked 41st in Vulnerability Management with 3 reviews while Tenable Vulnerability Management is ranked 2nd in Vulnerability Management with 39 reviews. IBM Guardium Vulnerability Assessment is rated 6.6, while Tenable Vulnerability Management is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of IBM Guardium Vulnerability Assessment writes "Worthwhile from the regulatory requirements and analytics perspective, but is expensive and not easy to use". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tenable Vulnerability Management writes "Discovers vulnerabilities and integrates well with other solutions". IBM Guardium Vulnerability Assessment is most compared with Tenable Nessus, Qualys VMDR, Rapid7 InsightVM, Orca Security and Acunetix, whereas Tenable Vulnerability Management is most compared with Tenable Security Center, Tenable Nessus, Qualys VMDR, Amazon Inspector and Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management. See our IBM Guardium Vulnerability Assessment vs. Tenable Vulnerability Management report.
See our list of best Vulnerability Management vendors.
We monitor all Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.