We performed a comparison between IBM Maximo and Oracle Enterprise Asset Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, IFS, Infor and others in Enterprise Asset Management (EAM)."We are very thankful to have IBM integrated with our own Legacy cloud-based system"
"The most valuable features of IBM Maximo are the overall power and interface, and there are a lot of different modules that we use that are helpful. Additionally, it's an integrated solution and it has a lot of capabilities."
"Has a powerful audit combination that helps achieve high accuracy."
"We were able to scale perfectly."
"IBM Maximo is the best software for assets management."
"The Preventive Maintenance feature, especially in its inspection routines and KPI abilities, is valuable."
"We can manage, organize, and track incidents, claims, jobs, tasks, preventive and corrective maintenance, locations, and assets."
"The most valuable feature is asset management maintenance as well as asset management overall."
"The whole product is important and valuable to us."
"It's quite reliable, but new versions often are not too stable. They bring in enhancements but they break other stuff."
"Coding can be complex when customization is required."
"The interface is not very easy or user-friendly and is in need of improvement."
"There are always ways to improve and make things better."
"Areas for improvement include: an enhanced Service Catalog on Mobile; Agent intelligence; better dashboards for KPIs."
"Areas for improvement would be the user interface and support for Arabic. They could also be more customer-oriented."
"It needs full-service visibility. There are a lot of things that are hard for users to find out. For example, the Service Catalog is not too friendly. You really have to know what you're looking for."
"IBM Maximo can improve the financial support and financial application, to make it more similar to an ERP as opposed to an EAM. Overall they can improve the financial processes."
"The product is not user-friendly."
More Oracle Enterprise Asset Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
IBM Maximo is ranked 1st in Enterprise Asset Management (EAM) with 23 reviews while Oracle Enterprise Asset Management is ranked 4th in Enterprise Asset Management (EAM) with 1 review. IBM Maximo is rated 8.0, while Oracle Enterprise Asset Management is rated 5.0. The top reviewer of IBM Maximo writes "Work order management and scalability enables the businesses' needs to be met". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Enterprise Asset Management writes "The product is not user-friendly, and it is very expensive, though it is highly stable". IBM Maximo is most compared with ServiceNow, JIRA Service Management, ABB Ability Asset Suite EAM, IFS Cloud Platform and Coupa Invoice, whereas Oracle Enterprise Asset Management is most compared with ABB Ability Asset Suite EAM.
See our list of best Enterprise Asset Management (EAM) vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Asset Management (EAM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.