We performed a comparison between IBM Security QRadar and Oracle Security Monitoring and Analytics Cloud Service based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Splunk, Microsoft, Wazuh and others in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)."We are using the platform version, which I like."
"The tool helps with infrastructure, application, and network monitoring."
"The most valuable feature is the machine learning module."
"The most valuable features are log monitoring, easy-to-fix issues, and problem-solving."
"IBM QRadar is easy to scale, it doesn't affect the environment. In our office, we have around 40 - 50 users, but our clients have more users on their networks. Our organization has staff in the software department that manages IBM QRadar for us."
"The monitoring and dashboards are great."
"The features that I have found most valuable are that it is very stable, easy to get going, and easy to manage. It is also easy to review all incidents."
"It is a scalable solution."
"The security level that they are maintaining with the pre-authentication keys is very good."
More Oracle Security Monitoring and Analytics Cloud Service Pros →
"I would like to see more integration in place after the security lock."
"The dashboards are all legacy and old."
"I have noticed a few things while working on this. After the restart of the server, sometimes, the services misbehave, and you need to manually start or restart the service. I have seen that specifically with the Tomcat service. Sometimes, when you click on log sources, instead of opening the log source extension, it redirects you over the internet."
"There should be an extension where we can get the reports. This could be an extension to the dashboard with the Guardian or another product with limited technology, for example IPS. Now, we only have IBM. Basically, it needs more and more integration models."
"The pricing of the solution is a bit high. If they could lower it, that would be ideal."
"The only problem is that if you have too many events that occur, then the storage capacity becomes a problem. We would need to increase the storage capacity."
"The product does not have a team for investigating malware."
"There is a shortage of skilled individuals with knowledge about the solution. There is training required."
"The solution could improve by providing better documentation for beginners to learn, such as videos or other tutorials."
More Oracle Security Monitoring and Analytics Cloud Service Cons →
More Oracle Security Monitoring and Analytics Cloud Service Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
IBM Security QRadar is ranked 4th in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) with 198 reviews while Oracle Security Monitoring and Analytics Cloud Service is ranked 43rd in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM). IBM Security QRadar is rated 8.0, while Oracle Security Monitoring and Analytics Cloud Service is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of IBM Security QRadar writes "A highly stable and scalable solution that provides good technical support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Security Monitoring and Analytics Cloud Service writes " Easy to install, highly secure standards, and reliable". IBM Security QRadar is most compared with Splunk Enterprise Security, Microsoft Sentinel, Wazuh, LogRhythm SIEM and Elastic Security, whereas Oracle Security Monitoring and Analytics Cloud Service is most compared with Microsoft Sentinel, AWS Security Hub, LogRhythm SIEM and Exabeam Fusion SIEM.
See our list of best Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) vendors and best User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) vendors.
We monitor all Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.