We performed a comparison between Mezmo and Splunk Enterprise Security based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Log Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution aggregates all event streams, so that if there are any issues, it's all in the same interface."
"LogDNA consolidates all logs into one place, which is super valuable."
"It is easy to use in any environment."
"The client site login is pretty extensible and probably cost-effective."
"Splunk allows us to customize processing and dashboards, which helps us take care of our customers' needs."
"There are lots of free learning materials on their website."
"We are much faster finding and addressing issues with Splunk."
"It is easy to use, and easy to implement."
"The most valuable feature of Splunk Enterprise Security is website activity monitoring."
"Splunk works based on parsing log files."
"Every once in a while, our IBM cloud operational implementation gets behind. Sometimes, when we have a customer event, we do not get access to the latest logs for about 30 minutes, particularly for the sites that are heavily utilized. This is clearly not good. It is impossible to RCA when you can't look at the logs that pertain to the time period in which the event occurred. It could be more of an operational problem than a feature problem. I don't have visibility about whether it is a LogDNA issue or just an operational issue."
"No ability to encapsulate a query or a filter, and communicate or share that among the team."
"Spam has different plugins but by default, the logs are not organized, it shows that there are roll-ups that are out of the box. I saw many plugins that can help improve or extend Splunk's functionality but I haven't tried any of them."
"When we do a rollout from the server or host or anything, we'd like to see more automation. It would save us time."
"Splunk is not very user-friendly. It has a complex architecture in comparison to other solutions on the market."
"The cluster environment should be improved. We have a cluster. In the Splunk cluster environment, in the case of heavy searches and heavy load, the Splunk cluster goes down, and we have to put it in the maintenance mode to get it back. We are not able to find the actual culprit for this issue. I know that cluster has RF and SF, but it has been down so many times. There should be something in Splunk to help users to find the reason and the solution for such issues."
"The product's price may be an area of concern where improvements are required."
"The documentation is in definite need of improvement."
"There is a definite learning curve to starting out."
"The glass table feature does not perform as expected."
Earn 20 points
Mezmo is ranked 54th in Log Management while Splunk Enterprise Security is ranked 1st in Log Management with 246 reviews. Mezmo is rated 9.0, while Splunk Enterprise Security is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Mezmo writes "Has vastly increased our ability to reach SLA targets consistently". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Splunk Enterprise Security writes "It has a drag-and-drop interface, so you don't need to know SQL or Java to construct a query ". Mezmo is most compared with Cribl Stream and Datadog, whereas Splunk Enterprise Security is most compared with Wazuh, IBM Security QRadar, Dynatrace, Elastic Security and Microsoft Sentinel. See our Mezmo vs. Splunk Enterprise Security report.
See our list of best Log Management vendors.
We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.