We performed a comparison between NetXMS and Zabbix based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Zabbix, Datadog, Auvik and others in Network Monitoring Software."We can manage the entire system across the network and troubleshoot the pain points."
"The single dashboard is a valuable feature."
"We have a large network spanning over 1000 kilometers. NetXMS provides visibility and sends alerts. Typically, most monitoring systems monitor every 60 seconds, but NetXMS allows us to adjust this. For critical links, we can set it to check every second. For our high-priority financial customers, we monitor every second. So, every three seconds, we receive another email and a Telegram alert. This helps us meet our SLAs (Service Level Agreements) with our high-priority customers."
"The most valuable features of Zabbix are flexibility and a single interface for different types of monitoring."
"The features I found most valuable are the user interface and a wide range of network devices that are easy to configure."
"Zabbix can use old data to current data to set the threshold. We can use previous data to set the threshold."
"I really enjoy network traffic triggers that allow us to check traffic threshold from ISP."
"I'm supervising all the IT departments, and Zabbix seems quite good for them. It provides graphics and information in real time. We get alerts about crashes on the system, enabling us to quickly repair issues. We can easily find devices with problems."
"The overall functionality of Zabbix is very good. The monitoring of bank applications that Zabbix provides is great. The information is displayed on a dashboard that is easily viewed."
"Zabbix is both stable and scalable."
"The level of discovery-based configuration that lets us auto-configure the monitoring for various systems is a valuable feature."
"The Wi-Fi side needs improvement."
"The technical support needs improvement."
"Based on my experience, there should be options for using the latest communication methods, like social media integration. Telegram is already integrated, but SMS and other alert options would be beneficial. So, integrating social media notifications into NetXMS would be a good thing."
"For us, the initial setup was complex"
"The stability could be better."
"The dashboard and the graph section could be a little bit more professional."
"The networking monitor is not too easy to work with."
"I think the reporting part of Zabbix can be improved in terms of more user-friendly graphics to display the collected data. Many simple users who don't know how to use Zabbix properly might get confused by the reporting, although at the same time it is very versatile for my company."
"I had problems using Zabbix when working with SUSE Enterprise; many companies use SUSE."
"I would like to see a more flexible mobile client, and better HA out of the box."
"In an upcoming release, there should be automated reports which we are currently doing manually. For example, if we collect a report file every day and want to send it to a moderator for review. We are expecting this feature to come out soon but it would be valuable to have now."
More Juniper Mist Premium Analytics Pricing and Cost Advice →
NetXMS is ranked 41st in Network Monitoring Software with 1 review while Zabbix is ranked 1st in Network Monitoring Software with 101 reviews. NetXMS is rated 10.0, while Zabbix is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of NetXMS writes "Offers custom monitoring functionality, user-friendly interface, custom maps feature and open source". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Zabbix writes "Allows any number of customizations but lacks functionality for finding root causes". NetXMS is most compared with PRTG Network Monitor, whereas Zabbix is most compared with Centreon, Checkmk, Nagios Core and Amazon CloudWatch.
See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.
We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.