We performed a comparison between New Relic and Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The versatility of the solution is its most valuable feature."
"The solution offers good documentation."
"You don't have to go through a list of 500 servers."
"New Relic has helped us in terms of the optimizing our print and loading times."
"The solution is quite stable."
"It is easier to create new dashboards in the New Relic interface, and it is also easier to query if when I want to monitor a different parameter or time duration on my dashboard."
"It is a software solution as a service, so I don't have to manage it on-premise."
"They instrument up from the bottom to the top – every piece of code - they have a very perfect read of what’s being done, and how long it’s taking."
"Service Bus topic subscription monitoring turned out to be the most useful for us."
"It offers all the core capabilities we need to manage and monitor our Azure services."
"The solution does not provide input on how the page performs in a big group. It just says that the page performance is bad, but it does not say what can be done to improve it. If they could provide some insight or guidance on how to make improvements, that would be a big help."
"We would like to receive more AWS-specific details from the New Relic Dashboard, like EC2 health."
"It is complicated, especially in how you interpret the data that it provides. If it had a bit more canned, out-of-the-box features, especially some of the reporting features, that would be more useful."
"The solution needs to have staging."
"We would like a dashboard feature to be created for this product. This would allow us to monitor both the front and back-end of our UIs performance, and then report on it."
"The monitoring is only as good as the alerts that it produces. By having it set up fine grain alerting, it is a bit of a pain."
"Compared to their competitors, they are missing some features at the moment."
"There are certain features that are not supported in New Relic, such as CATSEARCH, which allows you to do a full-text search."
"Addition of more monitoring features to Azure Cosmos DB can be a huge help as we use the same as the main database for our applications."
"The user interface of Serveress360 could be improved a bit to make the platform even easier to use."
Earn 20 points
New Relic is ranked 3rd in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 152 reviews while Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) is ranked 76th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability. New Relic is rated 8.6, while Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of New Relic writes "Has a simple user interface and end-to-end monitoring and self-healing features". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) writes "Great topic subscription monitoring, helpful management, and useful for audits". New Relic is most compared with Dynatrace, Datadog, Elastic Observability, Grafana and Prometheus, whereas Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) is most compared with Azure Monitor. See our New Relic vs. Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) report.
See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors and best Cloud Monitoring Software vendors.
We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.