We performed a comparison between Oracle CRM and SugarCRM Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two CRM solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution is scalable."
"The most valuable features of the solution I like are its stability and customization."
"Everything related to insights and dashboards is valuable. It is great for tracking all the effort and generating reports."
"The most valuable feature of Oracle CRM is the organization it provides."
"Technical support is very fast. It's customer friendly."
"The reporting features are valuable."
"Oracle CRM accommodates client needs, potentially reducing licensing costs with a pay-as-you-go approach. It also allows for the standardization of processes and reporting, which is important for our organization. Additionally, integration through APIs improves connectivity."
"The solution is smooth, easy to use, easy to customize and it has many features. Plus, there are regular updates."
"It works well with Jira. You can customize it to fit your needs."
"The most valuable features of Sugar Enterprise are the exports of graphics, statuses, complaints, and tasks."
"The most valuable aspect of this solution is its low cost."
"The most valuable feature is relation capability, which allows us to relay customers with invoice orders."
"The most valuable features of the SugarCRM platform include its flexibility in customizing fields, layouts, and dashboards."
"A specialized team is required for managing Oracle, which is extra overhead for the customer."
"An improvement would be to lower the price of the license."
"It’s complex to customize the tool."
"Oracle CRM should have more integration with different platforms."
"I think Oracle CRM could improve its user interface and user experience to make it more engaging. Currently, it has a more traditional enterprise look, but I believe it could benefit from more catchy and engaging colours and designs to better engage with users and stakeholders. While the capabilities might be there, the interface may not be very inviting for first-time users."
"With Oracle CRM, people report some usual downtime and frequent outages."
"The data visualization should be better in Oracle CRM."
"In the planning area in order to calculate commissions the function could be improved. Currently, we are not using that functionality because it is very basic."
"Sugar Enterprise could improve by removing bugs and glitches. For example, a comment was made but in the comment section, it was never displayed. However, the problems we faced might not be the fault of the solution."
"It lacks customization, and this is the main reason that we are switching to a different solution."
"You cannot include all your entities under one instance at the moment."
"I would like to see more integration on a mobile platform in the next release."
"While it is already user-friendly, a slight enhancement in UI design, especially in terms of color combinations, could make the platform more visually appealing and comfortable to use."
"In the next release, I would like to see personalization of information about customers or specific businesses or opportunities."
Oracle CRM is ranked 8th in CRM with 35 reviews while SugarCRM Platform is ranked 24th in CRM with 11 reviews. Oracle CRM is rated 8.0, while SugarCRM Platform is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of Oracle CRM writes "Typical configuration, no customization needed and quick to deploy". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SugarCRM Platform writes "User-friendly and allows for creating your own modules". Oracle CRM is most compared with Siebel CRM, SAP CRM, Microsoft Dynamics CRM, Amdocs CRM and Salesforce Sales Cloud, whereas SugarCRM Platform is most compared with Salesforce Sales Cloud. See our Oracle CRM vs. SugarCRM Platform report.
See our list of best CRM vendors and best Marketing Automation vendors.
We monitor all CRM reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
