We performed a comparison between PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition and Tenable Nessus based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Vulnerability Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Parallel scans can be done with PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition."
"The most valuable features of PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition are the vast amount of options and ease of use. They frequently improve the solution every six months to a year. Additionally, if we want any more features we can upload a custom script to meet our needs."
"The product's initial setup phase was super easy."
"We are in the early stage of using the solution making it difficult to fully determine the best features. However, we have noticed the CMDB and device discovery features look valuable at this time."
"The initial setup is straightforward."
"I like normal dynamic scanning, general web applications scanning, and vulnerability assessments."
"The tool is loaded with many features that give us ROI."
"The product is easy to use."
"The most valuable feature of Tenable Nessus is the support it provides for any new vulnerabilities quickly."
"The product's most valuable features are vulnerability and asset management. It can define the rules and validate the configuration."
"The features of Tenable Nessus that I have found most valuable are its reliability and its ability to collate a dependable output, where we are able to get the same vulnerability when we test manually. The output is quite reliable."
"The solution is the most dynamic one I have seen thus far."
"Its initial setup was simple and straightforward."
"It also has an executive report where you don't have to provide the client all the detail for them to sift though. But if they wish to dig through the detail they can."
"Nessus is effortless to integrate."
"Overall Zoom is a good solution."
"There are features or functionality missing, but PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition does try to update frequently to alleviate the shortcomings."
"The product needs to have the ability to evaluate more."
"There's definitely room for improvement. There are lots of false positives. Once I do the manual assessment, it comes as a false positive. They need to improve the Enterprise Edition, especially the part that gives false positives."
"It would be better if the solution is cloud-based."
"PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition should incorporate a static code analysis feature. One main issue we encounter is false positives. False positives can be challenging for developers."
"The cost per license per user could be cheaper, specifically for individual licensing."
"From my personal experience, the solution's performance could be improved."
"The implementation of the solution is quite complicated and could be easier."
"Vulnerability recommendations are outdated and not in line with industry standards."
"They could make their reporting a little better."
"Online learning could be a bit better."
"Tenable Nessus application device assessment is one of the top tools. However, in the application security assessment, there are other tools that provide better, and more accurate findings."
"The report for counters is too simple and would be improved by a dashboard."
"The solution could improve by having better integration with different vendors' IPS solutions. The ACLs and IPS policies signatures should be enabled based on the results of Tenable Nessus automatically, we currently have to do it manually which is very time-consuming. It has done a good job integrating with Fortinet but we would like it to be better integrated with other solutions that we have."
"They have added a new Tenable Nessus Expert. That is their new product, which caters to the cloud and everything else. I am assuming that the new features and product enhancements are based on that tool set, but we haven't reviewed it yet."
"The accuracy of the vulnerability assessment is not up to par yet, as false alarms and false positives occur often."
More PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition Pricing and Cost Advice →
PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition is ranked 14th in Vulnerability Management with 10 reviews while Tenable Nessus is ranked 3rd in Vulnerability Management with 75 reviews. PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition is rated 8.0, while Tenable Nessus is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition writes " With a super easy initial setup phase, the tool also offers regular updates". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tenable Nessus writes "Unlimited assets for one price and quick, agentless results". PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition is most compared with Acunetix, Rapid7 Metasploit, Tenable Vulnerability Management, Wiz and Qualys VMDR, whereas Tenable Nessus is most compared with Qualys VMDR, Rapid7 InsightVM, Tenable Vulnerability Management, Tenable Security Center and Acunetix. See our PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition vs. Tenable Nessus report.
See our list of best Vulnerability Management vendors.
We monitor all Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.