We performed a comparison between Proxmox VE and RHEV based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Server Virtualization Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The tool has very good performance."
"We are happy with Proxmox VE. We use it as part of a cluster."
"Proxmox VE is very lightweight, and it doesn't take a lot of memory on the device."
"The most valuable feature of Proxmox VE is its ease of use."
"We can access the product from iPhone 7. It is stable and easy."
"The solution allows for easy integrations."
"The affordability of the solution is the product's most valuable aspect."
"The most valuable feature of Proxmox VE is the linked clone."
"It is a stable solution...It is a scalable solution."
"Red Hat is the most stable system."
"It is a scalable solution."
"The solution is a great all-round product. The virtualization is especially good."
"There aren't any bugs on the solution."
"The solution has a good licensing module."
"It is easy to deal with when comes to application migration and its compatibility with the multiple component applications."
"The most valuable feature of Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization is its pricing."
"The solution should include some features that can help with converting raw files into different formats. It should offer better management around raw files."
"The Windows drivers could be easier (unlike manually installing Ballon, QEMU and optionally SPICE, VIRTio, etc.)"
"Its performance and support can be improved. Currently, there is a cost for support."
"The solution needs a better billing system."
"The solution needs to move to the cloud. It would be nice if they made it more robust there."
"One issue with Proxmox is that some processes are not automatic. For some processes, you have to do it manually by command line."
"The only disadvantage of Proxmox VE is that it is a young solution so it does have some bugs."
"We are facing issues with disk utilization and disk performance."
"The biggest improvement would be more third-party direct support for things like backups and provisioning through third-party portals."
"Configuring the network interfaces is much better in Ubuntu and should be improved."
"The availability of technical expertise with the solution may be limited in some areas."
"In comparison to VMware, this solution isn't as stable. We're testing it right now, and we're not trusting the stability of the product."
"The solution has a very small lifecycle."
"It would be better to have more patches, especially kernel-level updates, live and online so that we can keep the business up and running during this period."
"Red Hat by itself is not scalable. But you can have third party add-ons like Ceph to make it massively scalable."
"With RHEV, the cyberattacks should be fewer. I want RHEV to be better protected."
Proxmox VE is ranked 1st in Server Virtualization Software with 58 reviews while RHEV is ranked 10th in Server Virtualization Software with 33 reviews. Proxmox VE is rated 8.6, while RHEV is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Proxmox VE writes "Easy to use and supports multi-monitors on multiple VMs in KVM". On the other hand, the top reviewer of RHEV writes "Offers frameworks with well-documented API and easy to use". Proxmox VE is most compared with VMware vSphere, Oracle VM VirtualBox, KVM, Nutanix AHV Virtualization and OpenVZ, whereas RHEV is most compared with VMware vSphere, KVM, Hyper-V, Oracle VM and Nutanix AHV Virtualization. See our Proxmox VE vs. RHEV report.
See our list of best Server Virtualization Software vendors.
We monitor all Server Virtualization Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.