We performed a comparison between QualiWare X and Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Enterprise Architecture Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."I like the solution's traceability."
"Some of the business processes are very easy to compare when you have the diagrams."
"It is a very rich tool in terms of the functionality, and the types of diagrams, that you can create in this tool."
"Its most valuable feature is the Zachman Framework."
"The most valuable features are the flexibility and adaptability of Sparx Enterprise Architect."
"Using Sparx Enterprise Architect allowed my customer to detail and make the company's IT strategy visible and accessible to all. The system provided clear roadmaps for IT development and helped to keep up-to-date documentation of systems and processes."
"It is simple to build the first model for the solution."
"It is a handy tool for visual modeling that provides opportunities for analysis, design, and support of models using ArchiMate, UML."
"For the most part, we find that it is remarkable how inexpensive it is."
"The solution is not easy and intuitive to use. I would also like the software to have a reference metamodel that can guide the modeling."
"The user interface is not so good. It's not easy for someone to use it at first. The product takes some getting used to."
"The solution needs to offer better support for the mobile-based system. Right now, it's not working."
"The UI could be improved and made a little bit more presentable."
"What should be improved are the integration capabilities of the solution with Bizagi."
"It should be made Windows compatible."
"It would be nice to have it supported on the Linux operating system."
"The Portfolio Management features can be added in the next release. As it helps you to manage more portfolio of projects and architectures of cost projects on a portfolio level. This would be an important feature in the next release."
"From a practical point of view, we need speed and reliability for creating a model and doing some really meaningful tasks such as application landscape, refactoring, etc. These are two primary criteria. Sometimes, when you import something, it creates the object duplicates, or it allows you to do something that you're not supposed to do. For example, validation is missing. This could be frustrating because when you work at a high speed, you need to come back and start fixing things that the tool allowed you to go with, which is not quite good. So, there should probably be some internal mechanisms to advise you about what you're doing and what is probably not the best idea."
More Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect Pricing and Cost Advice →
QualiWare X is ranked 23rd in Enterprise Architecture Management with 3 reviews while Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect is ranked 2nd in Enterprise Architecture Management with 97 reviews. QualiWare X is rated 7.6, while Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of QualiWare X writes "Works as a reference for architecture but not very intuitive ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect writes "Easy to set up and had no issues with stability, but it's not a very friendly tool, and its database modeling and entity-relationship modeling functions need improvement". QualiWare X is most compared with ARIS Cloud, whereas Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect is most compared with Visual Paradigm, Visio, No Magic MagicDraw, LeanIX and Lucidchart. See our QualiWare X vs. Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect report.
See our list of best Enterprise Architecture Management vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Architecture Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
