We compared Wazuh and Security Onion based on our user's reviews in several parameters.
Wazuh stands out for its flexibility in tailoring solutions, exceptional customer service, and cost-effective pricing. On the other hand, Security Onion is praised for its comprehensive network security monitoring capabilities, community support, and effective incident response tools. Wazuh could benefit from interface enhancements, while Security Onion needs better customization options and documentation clarity.
Features: Wazuh is valued for its advanced threat detection and flexible customization, whereas Security Onion is praised for its comprehensive network security monitoring, user-friendly interface, and extensive integration of open-source security tools.
Pricing and ROI: The setup_cost for Wazuh is considered straightforward and hassle-free, with reasonable pricing options. The licensing is flexible and customizable to individual needs. On the other hand, there are discussions among users about the pricing, setup cost, and licensing of Security Onion, without using the word "review.", Wazuh has shown positive ROI, with users reporting various benefits. Security Onion has also provided measurable ROI, contributing effectively to organizational security.
Room for Improvement: Wazuh could benefit from enhancing its interface and navigation, clearer documentation, and more intuitive configuration options. Users suggested improvements for system resource consumption. Security Onion needs enhanced customization options, improved user interface and interaction, detailed documentation, and scalability and performance improvements.
Deployment and customer support: The user reviews comparing Wazuh and Security Onion indicate that while some users spent three months on deployment and a week on setup for Wazuh, others spent a week on both phases, implying that they refer to the same period. For Security Onion, the feedback mentions varying timeframes, emphasizing the significance of considering the context in which terms like deployment, setup, and implementation are used., Wazuh's customer service and support are highly regarded by users. They appreciate the prompt and attentive assistance, with the team commended for their knowledge, efficiency, and helpfulness in resolving problems. On the other hand, Security Onion's customer service is consistently commendable, with customers expressing satisfaction in resolving issues and receiving prompt responses. The support is perceived as reliable, effective, and helpful throughout their experiences.
The summary above is based on 34 interviews we conducted recently with Wazuh and Security Onion users. To access the review's full transcripts, download our report.
"The most valuable feature of Security Onion for security monitoring is its ability to find infected ports."
"Security Onion is the most mature solution in the market."
"We use Security Onion for internal vulnerability assessment."
"Wazuh automatically scans the host for CIS benchmarks for the latest updates and vulnerabilities and gives a host score. It provides a percentage of perceived risk due to of non patches or any missing patches on that work."
"The product’s interface is intuitive."
"It's stable."
"Wazuh is simple to use for PCI compliance."
"It's very easy to integrate Wazuh with other environments, cloud applications, and on-prem applications. So, the advantage is that it's easy to implement and integrate with other solutions."
"Wazuh has very flexible and robust features."
"I like that the solution is on top of the Kubernetes stack."
"Integrates with various open-source and paid products, allowing for flexibility in customization based on use cases."
"Security Onion's user interface could be improved."
"The product is not easy to learn."
"The initial setup of the solution is a little bit difficult."
"Scalability is a challenge because it is distributed architecture and it uses Elastic DB. Their Elastic DB doesn't allow open source waste application."
"The only challenge we faced with Wazuh was the lack of direct support."
"The technical support can be improved. Wazuh has some bugs that need to be fixed. It would be good if we can have automation with respect to incidence responses."
"Wazuh has a drawback with regard to Unix systems. The solution does not allow us to do real-time monitoring for Unix systems. If usage increases, it would be a heavy fall on the other SIEM solutions or event monitoring solutions."
"I think that the next release should be more suitable for large enterprises, because currently they are not because large companies do not rely on open source solutions."
"The implementation is very complex."
"Since it's an open-source tool, scalability is the main issue."
"Its configuration process is time-consuming."
Security Onion is ranked 33rd in Log Management with 3 reviews while Wazuh is ranked 2nd in Log Management with 38 reviews. Security Onion is rated 7.6, while Wazuh is rated 7.4. The top reviewer of Security Onion writes "A mature and affordable solution that is easy to install and easy to update". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Wazuh writes "It integrates seamlessly with AWS cloud-native services". Security Onion is most compared with Elastic Stack, TheHive, Splunk Enterprise Security, Graylog and Kali Linux, whereas Wazuh is most compared with Elastic Security, AlienVault OSSIM, Splunk Enterprise Security, Graylog and IBM Security QRadar. See our Security Onion vs. Wazuh report.
See our list of best Log Management vendors.
We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.