We performed a comparison between TestProject and Tricentis Tosca based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Test Automation Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The ease of web and mobile functional testing is pretty easy on TestProject."
"The script-less part of it was good for novice users."
"It is a stable solution...It is a scalable solution."
"Since implementing this solution, our code management has been reduced by 40% to 60%."
"The automation and AI are very good."
"Ability to carry out automatic testing without having coding knowledge."
"Compared to other tools we have been looking at, you don't have to be a programmer to operate it, though it helps. It also a product that can be used by business people."
"The most important feature is its ability to support the technical automation of specific clients that we cannot use with other tools."
"It can provide all levels of testing from design to execution to reporting."
"The initial setup isn't too difficult."
"You can quickly build automated testing, manage it, and have it run on a regular basis to ensure that there are no issues."
"This solution is easy to use for everybody, including those who are not IT-educated."
"The item that is different from all the other tools is that it's module based."
"The most valuable feature is being able to create a test case by recording some scenarios and then leasing that task case to other scenarios."
"In an upcoming release, there should be a SaaS offering available."
"We'd like to see a direct cloud from TestProject instead of some other third party."
"The support is a weak point since they discontinued the tool."
"I and some other experts may be able to understand the solution's reporting system, but a layperson won't understand it."
"TestProject needs better support for integration with other products to provide a better overall solution for test planning and test data management."
"Difficult trying to configure on more than one browser."
"The source controls that are in Tricentis Tosca have some problems. For example, if you use Selenium or use Java-based application, it's easy to match code from two developers. However, if you're a developer and going to look at Tricentis Tosca, it's very difficult to use the source control measure."
"I would like to see more implementation of AI on the self-healing aspect. That would be like the next step."
"The solution should work with the Linux platform. Right now, it only runs on Windows."
"It needs better integration with JIRA."
"Might have a learning curve, as it does not follow the traditional Record-Play functionality, but tests have to be built from requirements or Agile story cards."
"I would like to be able to manage different projects in one repository or have better data exchange between repositories."
"It can be quite expensive."
"The user management could improve in Tricentis Tosca because it is confusing. It would be better to have it in one place. Having to add it to the cloud and to a specific project can be a mess."
TestProject is ranked 17th in Test Automation Tools with 6 reviews while Tricentis Tosca is ranked 1st in Test Automation Tools with 98 reviews. TestProject is rated 7.2, while Tricentis Tosca is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of TestProject writes "An easy-to-use tool that saves time and functions within a limited budget". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tricentis Tosca writes "Does not require coding experience to use and comes with productivity and time-saving features ". TestProject is most compared with Katalon Studio and Testim, whereas Tricentis Tosca is most compared with Katalon Studio, OpenText UFT One, Worksoft Certify, Postman and Testim. See our TestProject vs. Tricentis Tosca report.
See our list of best Test Automation Tools vendors and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.
We monitor all Test Automation Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.