We performed a comparison between 3SL Cradle and Jira based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Application Requirements Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."3SL Cradle's most valuable feature is its flexibility in managing all your needs immediately."
"It is very flexible, so we can do pretty much what we want with it."
"The most valuable features are that it is good for tracking the issues and it provides for the usage of Confluence."
"The solution works well and does what it needs to do."
"The product is good, stable and very cost-effective for small teams."
"Jira has a good reporting system. It also has an API, so we can do all sorts of reporting."
"The dashboard and reports tracking and the setup updates quickly, I am very impressed with those features. Additionally, it is user-friendly."
"Work management software that has the flexibility to be configured for any company. It's stable, scalable, and offers responsive support."
"You can record your unit testing, regression testing, UATs, et cetera."
"3SL Cradle could be improved with better support for SysML functionalities."
"Out-of-the-box reporting is limited. It would be helpful if more customisation was possible."
"It is not user-friendly."
"It should be connected to ServiceNow."
"The reports in Jira can be improved, especially for test reports. I find it difficult to customize and integrate for different testing purposes."
"Jira can improve by making user management better. It is not easy to have visibility of who has the right to do what. Only the administrator has this visibility but there should be the option for other users too."
"I would like to see visualization of release planning. I can list the releases and I can give dates to releases, but to show how they are happening on a timeline, I would need to order the Portfolio part. But just for this, it may be too much to use the Portfolio for that."
"Once a story is closed, all the records, versions, and documentation associated with it are gone. We lose the traceability of what was done."
"If you're not a technical person, it might not be very user-friendly."
3SL Cradle is ranked 11th in Application Requirements Management with 3 reviews while Jira is ranked 2nd in Application Requirements Management with 266 reviews. 3SL Cradle is rated 8.0, while Jira is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of 3SL Cradle writes "Flexible solution that manages all your needs". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Jira writes "A great centralized tool that has a good agile framework and is useful for day-to-day planning, task management, and work log efficacy". 3SL Cradle is most compared with IBM Rational DOORS, whereas Jira is most compared with Microsoft Azure DevOps, IBM Rational DOORS, OpenText ALM Octane, Rally Software and Polarion ALM. See our 3SL Cradle vs. Jira report.
See our list of best Application Requirements Management vendors.
We monitor all Application Requirements Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.