We performed a comparison between Ab Initio Co>Operating System and AWS Glue based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Cloud Data Integration solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Co>Operating System's most valuable feature is its ability to process bulk data effectively."
"Ab Initio reaches the highest performance and is very flexible in processing huge amounts of data."
"AWS Glue is quite better than other tools, but you have to learn it properly before you start using it."
"The solution is highly user-friendly, and its features are easy to use. The new addition of AWS Glue Data Catalog is also very beneficial, making the tool even more helpful for its users."
"Transformations are valuable because you can modify or override complex data logic from an open source or Spark to solve issues."
"The solution helps organizations gain flexibility in defining the structure of the data."
"The product has a valuable feature for data catalog."
"I also like that you can add custom libraries like JAR files and use them. So, the ability to use a fast processing engine and embed basic jobs easily are significant advantages."
"One of the best features of the solution is its ability to easily integrate with other AWS services."
"AWS Glue is a stable and easy-to-use solution."
"An awesome improvement would be big data solutions, for example, implementing some kind of business intelligence or neural networks for artificial intelligence."
"Co>Operating System would be improved with more integrations for less well-known technologies."
"It fails to handle massive databases acquired from various sources."
"I would like to see a more robust interface on the no-code side. This would be nice to be able to split cells."
"The solution could be cheaper. The price of the solution is an area that needs improvement."
"AWS Glue would be improved by making it easier to switch from single to multi-cloud."
"I haven't looked into Glue in terms of seeking out flaws. I've not come across missing features."
"The monitoring is not that good."
"In terms of improvement, the performance of AWS Glue could be faster."
"The start-up time is really high right now. For instance, when you start up a new job, you have to wait for five or eight minutes before it starts. If the start-up time is reduced to one or two minutes, it will be great. It will be better to have a direct linkage to Redshift in AWS. If we can use data catalogs from Redshift, it will be so easy to create some data catalogs. Currently, we can only use data catalogs from S3."
More Ab Initio Co>Operating System Pricing and Cost Advice →
Ab Initio Co>Operating System is ranked 28th in Data Integration with 2 reviews while AWS Glue is ranked 1st in Cloud Data Integration with 37 reviews. Ab Initio Co>Operating System is rated 9.6, while AWS Glue is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Ab Initio Co>Operating System writes "Excellent bulk data processing for large enterprises". On the other hand, the top reviewer of AWS Glue writes "Provides serverless mechanism, easy data transformation and automated infrastructure management". Ab Initio Co>Operating System is most compared with SSIS, Collibra Catalog, Azure Data Factory, Talend Data Management Platform and Informatica Cloud Data Integration, whereas AWS Glue is most compared with AWS Database Migration Service, Informatica PowerCenter, Informatica Cloud Data Integration, SSIS and Talend Open Studio. See our AWS Glue vs. Ab Initio Co>Operating System report.
See our list of best Cloud Data Integration vendors.
We monitor all Cloud Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.