We performed a comparison between Alcatel-Lucent Teldat and Ubiquiti Wireless based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Wireless WAN solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The tool can work without distributor architecture or seller access points."
"The stability is excellent."
"When you go on the website, everything is clear and you don't have to ask questions."
"I have found the most valuable features to be the ability to use the main centralized administration process and the internet."
"This is a high-quality solution that allows us to provide wifi access points in challenging areas."
"It's very easy to use. The hardware is very easy to use, compared to Microsoft. Microsoft is more complicated. It has software that is okay if you are familiar with it. In my opinion, Ubiquiti hardware is more heavy duty then Microsoft."
"We have found the product to be scalable."
"The main strength of Ubiquiti Wireless is the ease of use it provides to users."
"Installation is easy with seamless integration of additional APs."
"The most valuable aspect of Ubiquiti is the ease of setup. It's easy to set up, secure, and use. It works on an adoption basis. I can pull the system up, design a network, and pull 20 different Ubiquiti units into it."
"Ubiquiti outdoor access points in particular, are really stable, and if there are no obstructions, Ubiquiti works well."
"I would like to see something for remote working."
"Alcatel-Lucent Teldat needs to reduce its price."
"The price could be reduced."
"The strength of the routers could be improved. When it comes to serious routing, the solution doesn't measure up to the big guys like Juniper and Cisco, but we don't expect it to."
"Better third-party integration would be helpful because often, Ubiquity is a product that customers choose after they already have something else from another vendor like HPE."
"I would like to see this solution have any kind of captive portal on the tool or user accounting tool. This would be quite useful for companies."
"t does not have traffic shaping or traffic policies in its wireless requirements."
"They have access points that are in the firewalls, and I believe the firewalls could be significantly better. They use the USG firewall, which I believe is a poor device. VPNs for example, it is really bad, it is difficult to configure, and I don't like them at all."
"I would like a better explanation or better documentation on how to use the onboard spectrum analyzer."
"In Ukraine at least, it's a problem when it comes to buying the hardware. For example, I made a request for 20 switches a few months ago. The solution needs to have worldwide availability."
"The external devices, the outdoor devices, are not so rugged. For example, for the weather that we have here in Florida, it doesn't hold up well even though it is supposed to be designed for outdoor use."
Alcatel-Lucent Teldat is ranked 8th in Wireless WAN with 3 reviews while Ubiquiti Wireless is ranked 1st in Wireless WAN with 68 reviews. Alcatel-Lucent Teldat is rated 9.6, while Ubiquiti Wireless is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Alcatel-Lucent Teldat writes "Provides a lifetime warranty, is reliable, has good technical support, and includes security features". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Ubiquiti Wireless writes "It's cheap and easy to use but isn't suitable for large deployments or complex use cases ". Alcatel-Lucent Teldat is most compared with , whereas Ubiquiti Wireless is most compared with Ruckus Wireless WAN, Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN, Cambium Networks Wireless WAN, Aruba Wireless and ExtremeCloud IQ. See our Alcatel-Lucent Teldat vs. Ubiquiti Wireless report.
See our list of best Wireless WAN vendors.
We monitor all Wireless WAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.