We performed a comparison between Allot IoTSecure and Forescout Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Forescout, Nozomi, Armis Security and others in IoT Security."The most valuable feature of Allot IoTSecure is bandwidth optimization."
"Forescout Platform has granular features and one of the most impressive features is the agentless feature."
"It has helped with improving our security posture in terms of controlling the access of rogue devices into our network through identification. We have been able to prevent rogue device activities on the network, check the health of the system, and ensure remediation."
"Its feature that I have found most valuable is that it is very granular. You can configure granular controls just as you want those policies to be implemented. It gives you that flexibility to go granular in how you want your controls to be implemented. That's something I like about it."
"The most valuable features are remote access and administration scripts."
"The most valuable features of the Forescout Platform are NAC for sharing, Network Access Control, and port sharing of the devices."
"Forescout Platform's most valuable features are that it is very granular. We are able to cull out a lot of information about our particular device or endpoint. The configuration and the visibility are very seamless. Overall the solution is very easy to handle and it's very comprehensive."
"Provides a good overview of all devices on a network."
"The most valuable features of ForeScout is the fact that it can do network access control either with 802.1x or without 802.1x."
"Allot IoTSecure could improve by providing better documentation, there was not any documentation on their website."
"The system controls could be better."
"The fact that Forescout Platform doesn't have a presence in the South African region is a weakness because of which you can't ask for help from them if you have any problems."
"Forescout Platform could improve the vulnerability management as well as the control on the endpoint, which needs to be connected to my network."
"Can be expensive if it's only being used for one feature."
"It does not support the TACACS+ protocol."
"Multitenancy should be included in the next version so it could be used as a managed service provider."
"If older network devices are used there can be some compatibility issues while using the Forescout Platform. Additionally, if the switches that are deployed in your infrastructure are not captured properly to the endpoints there might be some difficulties with Forescout Platform trying to monitor the network traffic. Traffic management is an area the vendor should work on."
"The product needs to improve its support. I know a case that dragged on for about one and a half years. They eventually suggested professional services and closed the ticket. We followed their advice, engaging the account manager and professional service team, only to discover that the issue was a bug. After reopening the case, it's been about six months, and the problem still hasn't been resolved."
Allot IoTSecure is ranked 9th in IoT Security with 1 review while Forescout Platform is ranked 1st in IoT Security with 69 reviews. Allot IoTSecure is rated 6.0, while Forescout Platform is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Allot IoTSecure writes "Useful bandwidth optimization, reliable, but difficult to implement". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Forescout Platform writes "We can go granular on each endpoint, quarantine non-compliant machines, and target vulnerabilities through scripting". Allot IoTSecure is most compared with , whereas Forescout Platform is most compared with Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine), Aruba ClearPass, Fortinet FortiNAC, Nozomi Networks and Armis.
See our list of best IoT Security vendors.
We monitor all IoT Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
