We performed a comparison between Amazon CloudFront and Verizon EdgeCast based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two CDN solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable feature of the solution is the speed of delivery."
"The product's most valuable feature is its ability to deliver content to users nearby."
"It has built-in DDoS protection, which protects against DDoS attacks."
"Amazon CloudFront is a stable solution."
"The tool is highly available and reliable. It helps to access server applications easily. Integrating Amazon CloudFront with other AWS services was very easy, I would rate it eight out of ten."
"The product is very well interconnected with other Amazon services."
"Feature-wise, I like the solution's signed URL because it provides security for me."
"The image loading process is easy and cost-effective too."
"The Rules Engine V4 is the most valuable feature."
"The product is easy to use and easy to implement."
"It's super easy to use and integrate with."
"I have utilized certain characteristics and invested effort in reading the documentation, which proved to be challenging."
"The solution can benefit from expanding its data center and server locations to multiple places for smoother content delivery with even lower latency. The latency we experience is sufficient for our needs, and we are doing well. However, if they expand their locations in the future, it could be a positive factor. Its competitors have multiple data and server locations."
"The lack of seamless integration made the setup process more complex and required additional research to manage all the services properly."
"The user interface could be improved."
"Support needs to be enhanced."
"The tool must provide regional control."
"Improvements are needed as per customer requirements."
"Amazon CloudFront is harder to understand compared to Azure."
"The web interface of the Verizon Edgecast portal is very old. It's not user-friendly, slow, and it is missing some valuable features like the ability to make bulk changes."
"In the next release, I would like to see more global endpoints for their CDN and a lower price."
"We could not create more than 15 custom rules."
Amazon CloudFront is ranked 4th in CDN with 22 reviews while Verizon EdgeCast is ranked 12th in CDN with 3 reviews. Amazon CloudFront is rated 8.2, while Verizon EdgeCast is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Amazon CloudFront writes "Top-notch in terms of customer service and offers pay-as-you-go model with a free tier". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Verizon EdgeCast writes "The product is easy to use and easy to implement, but we have to raise new feature requests frequently because the product is new". Amazon CloudFront is most compared with Azure Front Door, Akamai, Cloudflare, Windows Azure CDN and G-Core Labs CDN, whereas Verizon EdgeCast is most compared with Akamai, Edgio, Windows Azure CDN and Cloudflare. See our Amazon CloudFront vs. Verizon EdgeCast report.
See our list of best CDN vendors.
We monitor all CDN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
