We performed a comparison between Amazon EKS and Docker based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Container Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Amazon EKS is like Kubernetes, but it helps manage our nodes and scalability in AWS."
"The stability of the solution is good."
"I like the scalability they're currently providing. Integration was very easy. It was a good experience."
"The most valuable feature is the cluster engine."
"What I found most valuable in Amazon EKS is its maturity as a cloud computing technology."
"Through Amazon EKS, we can have the blue-green deployment very easily."
"Amazon EKS can be used to implement and create clusters."
"Amazon EKS is very scalable."
"Docker's containerization property is its main selling point."
"I think the best feature is to replicate anything in our local machine using a simple command."
"The solution is stable."
"The most valuable feature of Docker is that it provides a containerized environment. The isolation between the environments is beneficial. Additionally, the solution is easy to use."
"The solution is easy to install."
"Docker is easy to understand and follow. It provides good scalability to the application."
"We are using Docker to host applications."
"We are able to stop our containers or stop the service with a single command."
"I would like to see the user interface improved because it is hard to find and not straightforward."
"I'm having difficulty getting my AWS clusters to communicate with my local machine."
"They should include some essential configuration features to it."
"There is room for improvement in stability. I faced some problems with the App."
"They could add logging features. At present, we use external tools to increase and decrease the number of instances."
"The tool's setup is complex."
"I would like to see a cloud setup bank management feature."
"Amazon EKS provides very minimum information during the upgrade of the node group."
"Docker can improve the integration with Microsoft Windows. It does not support native installations."
"Marketing of Docker is one area that needs to improve."
"Docker could improve by having security vulnerability reports."
"Docker could improve by providing the ability to use the GPU for parallel processing. If there was the capability of using the GPU it would improve the machine learning that I want to use."
"I advise new users to review their website, commands, and the steps for creating images."
"The volumes for persistent storage could be more user friendly right out of the box."
"They should provide proper documentation to understand the solution's cgroup process."
"We'd like knowledge transfer to be easier."
Amazon EKS is ranked 2nd in Container Management with 39 reviews while Docker is ranked 7th in Container Management with 40 reviews. Amazon EKS is rated 8.6, while Docker is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Amazon EKS writes "Supports multiple tools and has a straightforward setup process ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Docker writes "Easy to deploy with an impressive networking feature". Amazon EKS is most compared with Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform, VMware Tanzu Mission Control, Kubernetes, Rancher Labs and NGINX Ingress Controller, whereas Docker is most compared with Mirantis Container Runtime, Rancher Labs, VMware Tanzu Mission Control, Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE and NGINX Ingress Controller. See our Amazon EKS vs. Docker report.
See our list of best Container Management vendors.
We monitor all Container Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.