We performed a comparison between Amazon EKS and Komodor based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Container Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It has valuable monitoring and insights features."
"The product helps us to configure the new environment."
"I can use the autoscaling feature to manage and scale up infrastructure."
"The most valuable features of Amazon EKS are its auto scaling ability and the ability for service discovery."
"The solution has very good basic features."
"The feature that I have found most valuable is that it is very user-friendly."
"It's a faster solution to adopt on native applications."
"The stability of the solution is good."
"Komodor's multi-cluster centralized event timeline is the most valuable feature."
"The event timeline has been super helpful, enabling us to overlay node events in the same timeline as deployment events... That helps an engineer very quickly troubleshoot without having to do too much digging."
"The more time we use Komodor the more we save. Currently, we have seen around a ten percent return on investment."
"The service overview is definitely the most valuable feature. With it, I can see all the services and see if they're healthy or not without having to go specifically into each workflow individually. It has been immensely helpful for us whenever we've had network issues or other such issues. We've been able to use Komodor and see at a glance where there might be potential issues."
"The most valuable aspect is the speed with which I can narrow down what's going on. Usually, I look at the overview of events and then the timeline of an event and the status of the logs to quickly check what's happening or what has happened."
"I would like to see it a little more stable, more operational, and more convenient to develop."
"I am not impressed with the tool's Amazon console. It also needs to add security features."
"I would like to see a cloud setup bank management feature."
"The management of the nodes in Amazon EKS should be improved."
"Amazon EKS needs to improve customer operations and technical support."
"The overall stability of the product should be improved to prevent any loss of data."
"They could add logging features. At present, we use external tools to increase and decrease the number of instances."
"Amazon EKS provides very minimum information during the upgrade of the node group."
"One thing we don't have visibility into, which I would love to have, is metrics, such as user logins and usage. It's really hard to know what people are doing when I don't have any metrics on that directly."
"I would like to see improvements in how the product is installed. We've already communicated these things directly to Komodor. One feature we would like to see is for Komodor to be highly available on the clusters. Currently, it's only able to run in one instance within the cluster."
"Komodor's visibility could be improved."
"I like the alerts that Komodor provides, but I think the alert interface could be improved."
"I hope that the cost analytics and resource usage allocation areas will see further development. For example, where we can now see if the pods are over- or under-provisioned, I wouldn't mind higher-level development."
Amazon EKS is ranked 2nd in Container Management with 39 reviews while Komodor is ranked 12th in Container Management with 5 reviews. Amazon EKS is rated 8.6, while Komodor is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of Amazon EKS writes "Supports multiple tools and has a straightforward setup process ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Komodor writes "Provides extensive visibility into our nodes and has been incredibly useful in freeing up our DevOps staff for other projects". Amazon EKS is most compared with OpenShift Container Platform, VMware Tanzu Mission Control, Kubernetes and Rancher Labs, whereas Komodor is most compared with Portainer and Rancher Labs. See our Amazon EKS vs. Komodor report.
See our list of best Container Management vendors.
We monitor all Container Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
