We performed a comparison between Amazon EventBridge and IBM MQ based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Message Oriented Middleware (MOM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Amazon EventBridge is very flexible."
"The best feature is that it allows you to perform recurring tasks efficiently."
"It has self-explanatory documentation and works with most projects."
"It's very simple to set up our cron with Amazon EventBridge."
"We like IBM MQ for our synchronous communications and transactional applications that require a lot of CPS."
"I haven't seen any severe issues related to it. Most of the time it's running. That is the advantage of IBM MQ."
"This solution has improved and influenced the communication between different applications, then standardized that communication."
"RabbitMQ and Kafka require more steps for setup than IBM MQ. Installation of the IBM product is very simple."
"I have found that the solution scales well."
"IBM HQ's stability is great - we send six million messages a day, and we're very satisfied with HQ's ability to handle that volume."
"Setting up MQ is easy. We had a "grow as you go" implementation strategy. We started with a single channel and progressed to multiple queues and channels depending on the systems and integrations with other systems. It was a gradual deployment and expansion as we grew the services interacting with the core system using MQ."
"The most valuable feature is that it's a very strong integration platform but it is quite a monolithic solution. It's got everything."
"It would be easy if we had an option to select multiple things to run the script from Monday to Friday."
"It would be good if the solution provided a feature to add multiple Cron expressions in one rule."
"Currently, it only supports triggering one job at a time. It would be helpful if it could handle multiple jobs or triggers simultaneously. What I mean is that currently, we can only perform one job at a time."
"Amazon EventBridge doesn't have the feature of event replay."
"I would like to see faster monitoring tools for this solution."
"IBM MQ's pricing is higher than its competitors'."
"It should support a wider range of protocols, not just a few specific ones. Many other products have broader protocol support, and IBM MQ is lagging in that area."
"The pricing needs improvement."
"I don’t like legacy view of MQ."
"It could get a face lift with a modern marketing campaign."
"The GUI part could be better."
"I can't say pricing is good."
Amazon EventBridge is ranked 4th in Message Oriented Middleware (MOM) with 4 reviews while IBM MQ is ranked 1st in Message Oriented Middleware (MOM) with 158 reviews. Amazon EventBridge is rated 9.0, while IBM MQ is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Amazon EventBridge writes "Allows automatic notifications for events and stable performance". On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM MQ writes "Offers the ability to batch metadata transfers between systems that support MQ as the communication method". Amazon EventBridge is most compared with Amazon SNS, PubSub+ Event Broker, Oracle BAM, TIBCO Enterprise Message Service and PubSub+ Event Portal, whereas IBM MQ is most compared with ActiveMQ, Apache Kafka, VMware Tanzu Data Services, Red Hat AMQ and Real-Time Innovations DDS. See our Amazon EventBridge vs. IBM MQ report.
See our list of best Message Oriented Middleware (MOM) vendors.
We monitor all Message Oriented Middleware (MOM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.