We performed a comparison between Amazon S3 and Wasabi based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Public Cloud Storage Services solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Enables content sharing by multiple users."
"Technical support is excellent."
"Amazon S3 has multiple types of data detection. You can store data on a monthly basis, yearly basis, and long term basis."
"The initial setup is not difficult or overly complex. It's very straightforward and easy to implement."
"The versioning of this solution for accidental deletion has been most valuable."
"The scalability of Amazon S3 is good."
"We can store incremental data and get high availability and fault tolerance."
"Amazon S3 is reliable."
"The most valuable feature of Wasabi is its cost."
"Basically, I set Wasabi up and forget it. I'll monitor it every once in a while just to make sure that it's working correctly."
"Wasabi is an easy-to-use solution."
"We can store our videos on hot storage, allowing immediate access to them."
"The tool is very user-friendly."
"The initial setup is straightforward."
"The most valuable feature of Wasabi is the backups."
"The support is better than other cloud providers but sometimes it takes a while to have a resolution to our issues."
"The stability of the solution has room for improvement."
"Amazon S3 could improve the limitation on how much data can be stored."
"Amazon S3 needs to simplify the backup features."
"If a certain resource is left unchecked, you can easily use a lot of it and drive up costs."
"Amazon S3 could improve by having more frequent updates."
"I would like to see the API for beginners improved because it is hard to understand."
"We need the mapping to Windows. That feature is needed in S3. That feature is in the Azure cloud where we can map it like a drive. We can map the cloud storage to the effort driving our Windows PC. But Amazon is not providing that feature for the S3 solution."
"The solution must allow the extension of the retention period."
"Setting up users on the appliance should be improved."
"Having the ability to upload and download data using third-party apps such as Mega which can sync to the desktop would be excellent."
"I don't have enough experience to understand the nuances of where they might improve."
"The scalability could be improved."
"The solution’s user reporting could be improved."
"The scalability could improve."
Amazon S3 is ranked 1st in Public Cloud Storage Services with 70 reviews while Wasabi is ranked 8th in Public Cloud Storage Services with 7 reviews. Amazon S3 is rated 8.8, while Wasabi is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Amazon S3 writes "Cloud Conversations: AWS S3 Overview". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Wasabi writes "An easy-to-use solution that can be used to move local backups to the cloud". Amazon S3 is most compared with Oracle Cloud Object Storage, Microsoft Azure File Storage, NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP, Amazon S3 Glacier and Zadara, whereas Wasabi is most compared with Microsoft Azure File Storage, Amazon S3 Glacier, Google Cloud Storage, Microsoft Azure Object Storage and NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP. See our Amazon S3 vs. Wasabi report.
See our list of best Public Cloud Storage Services vendors.
We monitor all Public Cloud Storage Services reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
