We performed a comparison between Anomali ThreatStream and ThreatQ based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Recorded Future, Microsoft, Check Point Software Technologies and others in Threat Intelligence Platforms."The feature I have found most valuable is credential monitoring. This feature is easy and quick."
"Integrating the solution with our existing security tools and workflows was easy."
"The reporting services are great. With reporting services, if you have customers that just visit a URL you can see the result - including why it's blocked and how and how the URL was first recognized as malicious."
"Less code in integration would be nice when building blocks."
"The tool is not user-friendly."
"The solution should be simpler for the end-user in terms of reporting and navigating the product."
Anomali ThreatStream is ranked 5th in Threat Intelligence Platforms with 1 review while ThreatQ is ranked 12th in Threat Intelligence Platforms with 2 reviews. Anomali ThreatStream is rated 7.0, while ThreatQ is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of Anomali ThreatStream writes "Easy and quick credential monitoring; tech support could be improved". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ThreatQ writes "Improves the threat intelligence gathering process, but it is not user-friendly". Anomali ThreatStream is most compared with Recorded Future, ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP), Splunk Enterprise Security, Group-IB Threat Intelligence and Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus, whereas ThreatQ is most compared with ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP), Recorded Future and Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR.
See our list of best Threat Intelligence Platforms vendors.
We monitor all Threat Intelligence Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
