Apache Spark vs Spring Boot comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Apache Logo
4,165 views|3,240 comparisons
89% willing to recommend
VMware Logo
28,075 views|18,408 comparisons
95% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary
Updated on May 15, 2022

We performed a comparison between Apache Spark and Spring Boot based on our users’ reviews in four categories. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.

  • Ease of Deployment: Some Apache Spark users say the initial setup is straightforward, while others feel it is complex. Most Spring Boot users say the initial setup is straightforward.

  • Features: Users of both products are happy with their performance, stability, and scalability. Apache Spark users say it is fast and can handle large amounts of data, but say that its UI should be clearer. Spring Boot users like its monitoring and tracking features but mention integration limitations.
  • Pricing: Both solutions are open-source and are free of charge.
  • Service and Support: Apache Spark and Spring Boot are open-source and therefore do not have dedicated support. However, there are extensive online resources and support forums available for both solutions.

Comparison Results: Spring Boot has a slight edge in this comparison due to it being the more user-friendly solution. One area where Apache Spark did come out on top was in the ease of deployment category.

To learn more, read our detailed Apache Spark vs. Spring Boot Report (Updated: May 2024).
772,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Q&A Highlights
Question: Which solution has better performance: Spring Boot or Apache Spark?
Answer: If we talk just about performance, Spark will be faster. ) But Spring and Spark are completely different products. Please, share additional info about data pipelines in your project.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The most valuable feature of Apache Spark is its ease of use.""The most valuable feature of Apache Spark is its flexibility.""It's easy to prepare parallelism in Spark, run the solution with specific parameters, and get good performance.""The main feature that we find valuable is that it is very fast.""This solution provides a clear and convenient syntax for our analytical tasks.""The processing time is very much improved over the data warehouse solution that we were using.""The distribution of tasks, like the seamless map-reduce functionality, is quite impressive.""The data processing framework is good."

More Apache Spark Pros →

"We like that the product is open-source.""It gives you confidence in a readily available platform.""The API gateway and cloud configuration allows us to configure the properties outside of the service with respect to enrollment.""Spring Boot's main feature is that it's great for DevOps because you can write your own application. You don't need to install Apache Tomcat. You can create your project easily with a few clicks.""The configuration setup in Spring Boot is pretty simplified compared to Hibernate ORM.""This is a stable solution that is being used in the HR space.""The Spring Cloud Gateway, Load Balancer are the valuable features. Apart from them, handling a sync call, then multiple service communication through field clients are also useful features.""It is a very scalable solution."

More Spring Boot Pros →

Cons
"The solution must improve its performance.""Apache Spark should add some resource management improvements to the algorithms.""It requires overcoming a significant learning curve due to its robust and feature-rich nature.""One limitation is that not all machine learning libraries and models support it.""At times during the deployment process, the tool goes down, making it look less robust. To take care of the issues in the deployment process, users need to do manual interventions occasionally.""Apache Spark could improve the connectors that it supports. There are a lot of open-source databases in the market. For example, cloud databases, such as Redshift, Snowflake, and Synapse. Apache Spark should have connectors present to connect to these databases. There are a lot of workarounds required to connect to those databases, but it should have inbuilt connectors.""In data analysis, you need to take real-time data from different data sources. You need to process this in a subsecond, do the transformation in a subsecond, and all that.""The product could improve the user interface and make it easier for new users."

More Apache Spark Cons →

"The solution could improve its flexibility.""They should include tutorial videos for learning new features.""We'd like to have fewer updates.""The services we develop are purely synchronous services, so there's a blocking and waiting state. This is a big problem in microservices.""When we change versions, we run into issues.""The product could be improved by supporting and integrating Hadoop.""I would like to see more integration in this solution.""This solution could be improved if there were more libraries available. We would also like more mobile platform functionality using low levels of code."

More Spring Boot Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Since we are using the Apache Spark version, not the data bricks version, it is an Apache license version, the support and resolution of the bug are actually late or delayed. The Apache license is free."
  • "Apache Spark is open-source. You have to pay only when you use any bundled product, such as Cloudera."
  • "We are using the free version of the solution."
  • "Apache Spark is not too cheap. You have to pay for hardware and Cloudera licenses. Of course, there is a solution with open source without Cloudera."
  • "Apache Spark is an expensive solution."
  • "Spark is an open-source solution, so there are no licensing costs."
  • "On the cloud model can be expensive as it requires substantial resources for implementation, covering on-premises hardware, memory, and licensing."
  • "It is an open-source solution, it is free of charge."
  • More Apache Spark Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "Spring Boot is free; even the Spring Tools Suite for Eclipse is free."
  • "This is an open-source product."
  • "It's open-source software, so it's free. It's a community license."
  • "This solution is free unless you apply for support."
  • "As Spring Boot is an open-source tool, it's free."
  • "Spring Boot is an open source solution, it is free to use."
  • "If you want support there is paid enterprise version with support available."
  • "This is an open source solution."
  • More Spring Boot Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Java Frameworks solutions are best for your needs.
    772,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:We use Spark to process data from different data sources.
    Top Answer:In data analysis, you need to take real-time data from different data sources. You need to process this in a subsecond, and do the transformation in a subsecond
    Top Answer:1. Open Source 2. Excellent Community Support -- Widely used across different projects -- so your search for answers would be easy and almost certain. 3. Extendable Stack with a wide array of… more »
    Top Answer:Springboot is a Java-based solution that is very popular and easy to use. You can use it to build applications quickly and confidently. Springboot has a very large, helpful learning community, which… more »
    Top Answer:Our organization ran comparison tests to determine whether the Spring Boot or Jakarta EE application creation software was the better fit for us. We decided to go with Spring Boot. Spring Boot offers… more »
    Ranking
    2nd
    out of 12 in Java Frameworks
    Views
    4,165
    Comparisons
    3,240
    Reviews
    26
    Average Words per Review
    444
    Rating
    8.7
    1st
    out of 12 in Java Frameworks
    Views
    28,075
    Comparisons
    18,408
    Reviews
    28
    Average Words per Review
    415
    Rating
    8.5
    Comparisons
    Learn More
    Overview

    Spark provides programmers with an application programming interface centered on a data structure called the resilient distributed dataset (RDD), a read-only multiset of data items distributed over a cluster of machines, that is maintained in a fault-tolerant way. It was developed in response to limitations in the MapReduce cluster computing paradigm, which forces a particular linear dataflowstructure on distributed programs: MapReduce programs read input data from disk, map a function across the data, reduce the results of the map, and store reduction results on disk. Spark's RDDs function as a working set for distributed programs that offers a (deliberately) restricted form of distributed shared memory

    Spring Boot is a tool that makes developing web applications and microservices with the Java Spring Framework faster and easier, with minimal configuration and setup. By using Spring Boot, you avoid all the manual writing of boilerplate code, annotations, and complex XML configurations. Spring Boot integrates easily with other Spring products and can connect with multiple databases.

    How Spring Boot improves Spring Framework

    Java Spring Framework is a popular, open-source framework for creating standalone applications that run on the Java Virtual Machine.

    Although the Spring Framework is powerful, it still takes significant time and knowledge to configure, set up, and deploy Spring applications. Spring Boot is designed to get developers up and running as quickly as possible, with minimal configuration of Spring Framework with three important capabilities.

    • Autoconfiguration: Spring Boot applications are initialized with pre-set dependencies and don't have to be configured manually. Spring Boot also automatically configures both the underlying Spring Framework and any third-party packages based on your settings and on best practices, preventing future errors. Spring Boot's autoconfiguration feature enables you to start developing Spring applications quickly and efficiently. With Spring Boot, you reduce development time and increase the overall efficiency of the development process.

    • Opinionated approach: Spring Boot uses its own judgment for adding and configuring starter packages for your application, depending on the requirements of your project. (These are defined by filling out a simple web-form during the initialization process.) Spring Boot chooses which dependencies to install and which default values to use according to the form’s values.

    • Standalone applications: Spring Boot allows developers to create applications that can run on their own without relying on an external web server, by embedding a web server inside the application. Spring Boot applications can be launched on any platform simply by hitting the Run command.

    Reviews from Real Users

    Spring Boot stands out among its competitors for a number of reasons. Two major ones are its flexible integration options and its autoconfiguration feature, which allows users to start developing applications in a minimal amount of time.

    A system analyst and team lead at a tech services company writes, “Spring Boot has a very lightweight framework, and you can develop projects within a short time. It's open-source and customizable. It's easy to control, has a very interesting deployment policy, and a very interesting testing policy. It's sophisticated. For data analysis and data mining, you can use a custom API and integrate your application. That's an advanced feature. For data managing and other things, you can get that custom from a third-party API. That is also a free license.”

    Randy M., A CEO at Modal Technologies Corporation, writes, “I have found the starter solutions valuable, as well as integration with other products. Spring Security facilitates the handling of standard security measures. The Spring Boot annotations make it easy to handle routing for microservices and to access request and response objects. Other annotations included with Spring Boot enable move away from XML configuration.”

    Sample Customers
    NASA JPL, UC Berkeley AMPLab, Amazon, eBay, Yahoo!, UC Santa Cruz, TripAdvisor, Taboola, Agile Lab, Art.com, Baidu, Alibaba Taobao, EURECOM, Hitachi Solutions
    Information Not Available
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company33%
    Financial Services Firm12%
    University9%
    Marketing Services Firm6%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm25%
    Computer Software Company13%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    Comms Service Provider5%
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm42%
    Computer Software Company16%
    Comms Service Provider11%
    Security Firm5%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm22%
    Computer Software Company14%
    Government7%
    Comms Service Provider7%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business42%
    Midsize Enterprise16%
    Large Enterprise42%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business17%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise71%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business43%
    Midsize Enterprise17%
    Large Enterprise40%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business19%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise67%
    Buyer's Guide
    Apache Spark vs. Spring Boot
    May 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Apache Spark vs. Spring Boot and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
    772,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Apache Spark is ranked 2nd in Java Frameworks with 60 reviews while Spring Boot is ranked 1st in Java Frameworks with 38 reviews. Apache Spark is rated 8.4, while Spring Boot is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Apache Spark writes "Reliable, able to expand, and handle large amounts of data well". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Spring Boot writes "It's highly scalable, secure, and provides all the enhanced tools I need. ". Apache Spark is most compared with AWS Batch, Spark SQL, SAP HANA, Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop and AWS Lambda, whereas Spring Boot is most compared with Jakarta EE, Open Liberty, Eclipse MicroProfile, Vert.x and Oracle Application Development Framework. See our Apache Spark vs. Spring Boot report.

    See our list of best Java Frameworks vendors.

    We monitor all Java Frameworks reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.