We performed a comparison between Aruba Networks Wireless WAN and Ubiquiti Wireless based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Wireless WAN solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The product gives good stability and concurrency."
"The security feature and the signal are good as they is dependent on our needs."
"Aruba is a very stable system."
"Aruba Networks Wireless WAN is stable and good."
"The solution is easy to use."
"The most valuable feature is reliability."
"The product keeps up with leading-edge technology so we have dependability and scalability."
"The initial setup is pretty straightforward."
"The solution offers us good situational awareness by providing information on user activity, signal strength, and all the data that you need to manage the system and understand issues."
"The range is usually pretty good, which is the most important thing to use because more or less, all wireless access points are the same."
"The setup is quite simple."
"Ubiquiti devices are centrally managed, and you can log into the access points via SSH. If the GUI isn't working for some reason, you can intervene via SSH."
"Ubiquiti Wireless is easy to use, it's stable and flexible, and the performance is great. It is scalable as well."
"We use the solution for many of our smaller customers and the cloud management aspect of the solution is very good. If you compare it to other vendors that have a controller, it's much easier to manage the cloud-based solution because we travel a lot. It allows us to manage everything from any place."
"It offers fair pricing."
"The most valuable aspect of Ubiquiti is the ease of setup. It's easy to set up, secure, and use. It works on an adoption basis. I can pull the system up, design a network, and pull 20 different Ubiquiti units into it."
"Aruba's technical support has room for improvement."
"The integration should be better."
"Device integration has room for improvement in Aruba Networks Wireless WAN."
"It works. We don't look at it any deeper than that and don't find any features ar missing."
"This product needs more flecibility with switching technologies."
"There’s a bit of complexity in the initial setup."
"They have to work on their Aruba Central cloud platform. There are still some glitches such as not showing proper user details. When we removed the AP from the Aruba Central cloud, it showed up as being connected to Aruba Central. They need to fix these issues."
"Its technical support service could be better."
"Better third-party integration would be helpful because often, Ubiquity is a product that customers choose after they already have something else from another vendor like HPE."
"The mesh configuration and WiFi 6 coverage should be improved."
"Ubiquiti could develop a more elaborate firewall solution. Their firewall solutions at the moment are entry-level. Maybe they don't want to bring those products in because many people prefer putting a third-party firewall into a solution like that. We usually do."
"Central monitoring is the main functionality that should be included in the product."
"This might not be the best solution for a very large organization."
"I would like to see this solution have any kind of captive portal on the tool or user accounting tool. This would be quite useful for companies."
"Difficult to see error logs and locate the problem."
"There isn't any technical support."
Aruba Networks Wireless WAN is ranked 5th in Wireless WAN with 47 reviews while Ubiquiti Wireless is ranked 1st in Wireless WAN with 68 reviews. Aruba Networks Wireless WAN is rated 8.4, while Ubiquiti Wireless is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Aruba Networks Wireless WAN writes "It's reliable, cost-effective, and easy to troubleshoot". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Ubiquiti Wireless writes "It's cheap and easy to use but isn't suitable for large deployments or complex use cases ". Aruba Networks Wireless WAN is most compared with Cambium Networks Wireless WAN, Fortinet FortiWLM and Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN, whereas Ubiquiti Wireless is most compared with Ruckus Wireless WAN, Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN, Cambium Networks Wireless WAN, Aruba Wireless and Cisco Wireless WAN. See our Aruba Networks Wireless WAN vs. Ubiquiti Wireless report.
See our list of best Wireless WAN vendors.
We monitor all Wireless WAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.