We performed a comparison between Aruba Virtual Intranet Access and Check Point Remote Access VPN based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about OpenVPN, Fortinet, Cisco and others in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN."The solution has good performance."
"It's an ideal gateway solution for small and medium businesses, i.e., around 300 devices can be easily handled."
"The solution is very user friendly."
"Check Point Remote Access VPN enables us to access on-premise applications while working from remote locations."
"The solution offers great security features, including zero-day protection, malware protection, anti-phishing, et cetera."
"The management of the solution is very simple. It allows for a single view of all the endpoints."
"The security of the solution is a good feature, the stability is a valuable feature, and the customization is also a nice feature."
"One of the most outstanding features is the ability to deliver third-party services and achieve double authenticity with integrated identities."
"The most important feature of Check Point Remote Access VPN is the multiple factor authentication."
"The ability to create your trigger data domains is the solution's most valuable feature."
"One of the features that I like most about this software is that it has a very intuitive, simple, and versatile interface that makes it easy to use and configure."
"There must be a more easy-to-use GUI."
"Configurations can be a bit complex."
"They need to increase their timeout. Right now, it will fail after ten seconds, however, it shouldn't fail until after 20 seconds."
"Improved scalability would allow the solution to handle larger numbers of users and devices without a significant impact on performance."
"Connection of devices from various locations is efficient though there are a few challenges when there is a network failure."
"We'd like to integrate Check Point into the Remote Access VPN solution and have the ability to integrate multiple devices as access points through the solution."
"The fully-featured security module is only supported on Windows and Mac systems, which means that organizations with Linux will face issues providing secure access."
"It's difficult to configure on Linux workstations as Check Point Remote VPN clients support only Windows and Mac devices."
"The main area for improvement is pricing. Another area could be integrating MFA authentication directly into the solution instead of using separate benchmark tools for implementation."
"Some configurations, like idle timeout (the requirement came from multiple users), are not possible to configure directly from the Check Point management server."
More Check Point Remote Access VPN Pricing and Cost Advice →
Aruba Virtual Intranet Access is ranked 31st in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN with 1 review while Check Point Remote Access VPN is ranked 6th in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN with 62 reviews. Aruba Virtual Intranet Access is rated 7.0, while Check Point Remote Access VPN is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of Aruba Virtual Intranet Access writes "Very user friendly but configurations can be a bit complex". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Check Point Remote Access VPN writes "Is easy to use and has a nice interface, but the scalability needs to improve". Aruba Virtual Intranet Access is most compared with OpenVPN Access Server and Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway, whereas Check Point Remote Access VPN is most compared with OpenVPN Access Server, Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client, Check Point Harmony Mobile, Fortinet FortiClient and Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange.
See our list of best Enterprise Infrastructure VPN vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Infrastructure VPN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.