We performed a comparison between Ataccama DQ Analyzer and Talend Data Quality based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Data Scrubbing Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It is also easy to deploy."
"The data profile itself is excellent. You can understand the quality of the data in layman's terms."
"The most valuable feature lies in the capability to assign data quality issues to different stakeholders, facilitating the tracking and resolution of defective work."
"With its frequency function, we were able to pick a line of business to be addressed first in one of our conversion projects."
"I like idea of storing the results of Data Quality jobs in a DB and having the ability to run reports in the DB to show a dashboard of quality metrics."
"We have used value frequency and patterns. We have been it impressed with these functions as they have helped us in making decisions in transformation work."
"Provides a flexible development environment to the coder."
"It lowers the amount of time in development from weeks to a day."
"This product speeds up the unit testing and QA for specific test scenarios. As a result, the development output quality can be evaluated and adjusted."
"The numerous components provided by Talend mean you’re able to create jobs quickly and efficiently."
"They could focus more on marketing the product. The current marketing strategy is not working."
"Although DQA can fetch data from most of the commonly used data sources, it has limited modifiers to get data, meaning that the number of technologies from which the data can be acquired is limited. For example, DQA does not support fetching data from Twitter or Facebook. Many competitors have this feature."
"In redundancy analysis, the query is failing to bring non-matched records. This query is an internal script. There is no way (that I know of) to fix this syntax error for future runs."
"Heap space issues plague us consistently. We maxed it out and it runs fine, then it doesn’t, then it does."
"NullPointerExceptions are going to be the death of me and are a big reason for our transition away from Talend. One day, it is fine with a 1000 blank rows, then the next day, it will find one blank cell and it breaks down."
"In terms of the solution's technical support, the interactions were satisfactory, but there is room for improvement, especially in managing expectations."
"SQL for displaying underlying data in non-match results does not work."
"Needs integrated data governance in terms of dictionaries, glossaries, data lineage, and impact analysis. It also needs operationalization of meta-data."
"The ability to change the code when debugging the JavaScript could be improved."
"When we upgraded to Version 6.4.1, we tried using a GIT repository instead of a SVN repository. After a few incidents where things disappeared and changes were not saved, we decided to go back to a SVN repository."
Earn 20 points
Ataccama DQ Analyzer is ranked 3rd in Data Scrubbing Software while Talend Data Quality is ranked 1st in Data Scrubbing Software with 20 reviews. Ataccama DQ Analyzer is rated 7.8, while Talend Data Quality is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Ataccama DQ Analyzer writes "Is easy to deploy and is free, but marketing strategies need improvement". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Talend Data Quality writes "Saves a lot of time, good ROI, seamless integration with different databases, and stable". Ataccama DQ Analyzer is most compared with Alteryx and Informatica Address Verification, whereas Talend Data Quality is most compared with Informatica Data Quality, Alteryx, Precisely Trillium, Informatica Cloud Data Quality and Ataccama ONE Platform. See our Ataccama DQ Analyzer vs. Talend Data Quality report.
See our list of best Data Scrubbing Software vendors.
We monitor all Data Scrubbing Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
