We performed a comparison between Atlassian SourceTree and Bitbucket based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Version Control solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The initial setup is straightforward."
"The interface is very good and is easy to use. It tells you when you've committed, when you've uploaded, and gives you the differences."
"The most valuable feature is the ability to fix a broken repository merge."
"The solution's initial setup process is straightforward."
"The solution is easy to use. If I need to check out my latest code or I need to send my local code to the depositories it is simple. Overall it is has been a good experience from my side using this solution."
"Git is Bitbucket's most valuable feature."
"Bitbucket is feasible and friendly compared to Visual Studio DevOps on the Microsoft platform."
"Its key strength lies in securing and centralizing code repositories."
"Bitbucket is a standard git implementation with perfectly coordinated screens, it's secure, and we have had no problems with it."
"The planning model is good, and so is the suite of applications around it."
"We can watch the newly implemented code. So it's quite nice to organize the teams to see what part of the work is done and what part of the code is already old or new. It is very good for that kind of management."
"The most valuable feature of Bitbucket is you can see the differences between the fresh code and the old code before you merge. Additionally, the solution is easy to use and well-integrated."
"For everyday use, I am more comfortable using the command line interface, rather than using SourceTree."
"The product's UI needs improvement."
"I have had a food experience with Atlassian SourceTree but it might not be for everyone."
"Its interface could be easy to understand for a programmer."
"Bitbucket should come with code review pre-integrated, which would be better than integrating another tool into the solution."
"I would like to see the tool's desktop version."
"Bitbucket can improve by integrating a tool to manage conflict code. This would save time."
"Could provide some default branching options for users to adopt."
"Currently, what's lacking in Bitbucket is the assignment feature."
"I rate the support from Bitbucket a four out of five."
"There could be more AI features included in the product."
"There are many places where the product could be expanded to make it a more complete solution."
Atlassian SourceTree is ranked 6th in Version Control with 5 reviews while Bitbucket is ranked 1st in Version Control with 42 reviews. Atlassian SourceTree is rated 7.2, while Bitbucket is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Atlassian SourceTree writes "An easy-to-setup solution, but its documentation could be better for technical support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Bitbucket writes "It's a good solution for storing code, but the usability and integration could be better". Atlassian SourceTree is most compared with Git, GitHub, Bitbucket Server and AWS CodeCommit, whereas Bitbucket is most compared with Bitbucket Server, AWS CodeCommit, GitHub, IBM Rational ClearCase and Liquibase. See our Atlassian SourceTree vs. Bitbucket report.
See our list of best Version Control vendors.
We monitor all Version Control reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.